The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
MPJ-DK 21:10, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Created by
Orygun (
talk). Self-nominated at 03:47, 13 August 2016 (UTC).
The article is newly written.
The article has not previously featured on the Main Page.
The article is long enough.
Citations are sufficient and drawn from reliable published sources.
No disputes surround the article.
I see nothing that might be construed as a BLP violation.
I can find no particular issues with plagiarism. The wording appears original.
I see no neutrality issues, either. This is a straightforward account.
The article is not up for AfD.
The Google Books hook fact checks out. -
BiruitorulTalk 05:25, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
@
Orygun and
Biruitorul: - Came to promote this but I do not see a direct citation by the "Pennsylvania" claim, for DYK hooks it must be directly cited after the sentence it occurs in. Please provide the specific source and we can get this promoted into the prep area.
MPJ-DK 13:00, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
MPJ-DK 21:10, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Created by
Orygun (
talk). Self-nominated at 03:47, 13 August 2016 (UTC).
The article is newly written.
The article has not previously featured on the Main Page.
The article is long enough.
Citations are sufficient and drawn from reliable published sources.
No disputes surround the article.
I see nothing that might be construed as a BLP violation.
I can find no particular issues with plagiarism. The wording appears original.
I see no neutrality issues, either. This is a straightforward account.
The article is not up for AfD.
The Google Books hook fact checks out. -
BiruitorulTalk 05:25, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
@
Orygun and
Biruitorul: - Came to promote this but I do not see a direct citation by the "Pennsylvania" claim, for DYK hooks it must be directly cited after the sentence it occurs in. Please provide the specific source and we can get this promoted into the prep area.
MPJ-DK 13:00, 20 August 2016 (UTC)