The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 03:39, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
... that a rough cut of "Deep Breath", the first episode of the
eighth series of Doctor Who, was leaked online more than a month before the episode is due to air?
ALT1:... that a rough cut of "Deep Breath", the first episode of the
eighth series of Doctor Who, was leaked online six weeks before the episode is due to air?
I like the second one better
Soccersalvatore (
talk) 22:37, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. The various facts in the hook are included in the article with inline citations and I detected no policy issues. I do not believe the nominator has 5 or more previous DYKs so no QPQ needs to be done.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:19, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 03:39, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
... that a rough cut of "Deep Breath", the first episode of the
eighth series of Doctor Who, was leaked online more than a month before the episode is due to air?
ALT1:... that a rough cut of "Deep Breath", the first episode of the
eighth series of Doctor Who, was leaked online six weeks before the episode is due to air?
I like the second one better
Soccersalvatore (
talk) 22:37, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. The various facts in the hook are included in the article with inline citations and I detected no policy issues. I do not believe the nominator has 5 or more previous DYKs so no QPQ needs to be done.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:19, 21 July 2014 (UTC)