The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Created by
Czar (
talk). Self nominated at 23:09, 12 August 2014 (UTC).
My review:
Newness: newly created six days before nomination.
Length: around twice the minimum length.
Within policy: content is well-cited, and no copyright/close-paraphrasing problems spotted.
Hook format: seems to meet the guidelines, and is very short and catchy.
Hook content: I'm slightly concerned that the hook states that the game "is part of the indie resurgence of couch co-op" as a fact. The article attributes that opinion to Pete Davidson, and
his article also doesn't state the claim as fact, saying "Couch co-op is coming back into fashion, it seems".
Image: Used in the article, licenced as CC-BY-SA 3.0, looks really good even at 100x100px.
So all looks to be good apart from the hook. Perhaps this can be tweaked slightly? Or if allowing hooks like this is standard practice at DYK, then I'm willing to let it slide - this is my first review in a good long while, after all. — Mr. Stradivarius♪ talk ♪ 13:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Since the DYK software assumes that the last icon given is the current status of the article, I'm placing this icon to indicate that final approval has not been given. (One icon per review is the standard.)
BlueMoonset (
talk) 04:59, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
@
Czar: here's a courtesy ping. Sorry, I should have probably pinged you earlier. — Mr. Stradivarius♪ talk ♪ 09:17, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
@
Mr. Stradivarius, thanks! I rephrased the hook. czar
♔ 00:11, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Created by
Czar (
talk). Self nominated at 23:09, 12 August 2014 (UTC).
My review:
Newness: newly created six days before nomination.
Length: around twice the minimum length.
Within policy: content is well-cited, and no copyright/close-paraphrasing problems spotted.
Hook format: seems to meet the guidelines, and is very short and catchy.
Hook content: I'm slightly concerned that the hook states that the game "is part of the indie resurgence of couch co-op" as a fact. The article attributes that opinion to Pete Davidson, and
his article also doesn't state the claim as fact, saying "Couch co-op is coming back into fashion, it seems".
Image: Used in the article, licenced as CC-BY-SA 3.0, looks really good even at 100x100px.
So all looks to be good apart from the hook. Perhaps this can be tweaked slightly? Or if allowing hooks like this is standard practice at DYK, then I'm willing to let it slide - this is my first review in a good long while, after all. — Mr. Stradivarius♪ talk ♪ 13:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Since the DYK software assumes that the last icon given is the current status of the article, I'm placing this icon to indicate that final approval has not been given. (One icon per review is the standard.)
BlueMoonset (
talk) 04:59, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
@
Czar: here's a courtesy ping. Sorry, I should have probably pinged you earlier. — Mr. Stradivarius♪ talk ♪ 09:17, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
@
Mr. Stradivarius, thanks! I rephrased the hook. czar
♔ 00:11, 30 August 2014 (UTC)