The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Casliber (
talk·contribs) 10:55, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Informative article. Date is good, length is good. Sourcing is generally alright, but Note # 32 is a press release and should be improved to an independent source. Otherwise should be good to go. Not totally hot on the hidden link in the hook, what's the idea behind it?
The Interior(Talk) 01:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your review. I replaced the reference with another one from the Houston Chronicle. About the hook I propose a different one.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Casliber (
talk·contribs) 10:55, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Informative article. Date is good, length is good. Sourcing is generally alright, but Note # 32 is a press release and should be improved to an independent source. Otherwise should be good to go. Not totally hot on the hidden link in the hook, what's the idea behind it?
The Interior(Talk) 01:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your review. I replaced the reference with another one from the Houston Chronicle. About the hook I propose a different one.