The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that the semi-aquatic grasshopper Cornops aquaticum is being trialled in South Africa as a biological control agent for the invasive
water hyacinth? Source: "The semiaquatic grasshopper Cornops aquaticum Bruner, which is highly specific of Eichhornia crassipes (Pontederiaceae), constitutes one of the most abundant herbivores in the Neotropical wetlands and a possible biological control agent of this weed in South Africa."
Created by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk). Self-nominated at 11:48, 7 December 2016 (UTC).
Beginning review--
Kevmin§ 16:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Article new enough and long enough. The article is cited and the hook is confirmed in the source. No policy issues were detected in the article. Looks good to go.--
Kevmin§ 21:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that the semi-aquatic grasshopper Cornops aquaticum is being trialled in South Africa as a biological control agent for the invasive
water hyacinth? Source: "The semiaquatic grasshopper Cornops aquaticum Bruner, which is highly specific of Eichhornia crassipes (Pontederiaceae), constitutes one of the most abundant herbivores in the Neotropical wetlands and a possible biological control agent of this weed in South Africa."
Created by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk). Self-nominated at 11:48, 7 December 2016 (UTC).
Beginning review--
Kevmin§ 16:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Article new enough and long enough. The article is cited and the hook is confirmed in the source. No policy issues were detected in the article. Looks good to go.--
Kevmin§ 21:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)