The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Orlady (
talk) 04:37, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
The Bushranger (
talk). Self nom at 19:18, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Looks good. Short but over the minimum length. New enough. Enough references in the article per DYK standards. The hook can be sourced to the available online snippets, even though the specific reference supporting the fact in the article is off line. No copyvios found on the material available on line, though I did not have access to offline sources for checking. For readers unfamiliar with "Mach" terminology it may be worth considering amending the hook to read:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Orlady (
talk) 04:37, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
The Bushranger (
talk). Self nom at 19:18, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Looks good. Short but over the minimum length. New enough. Enough references in the article per DYK standards. The hook can be sourced to the available online snippets, even though the specific reference supporting the fact in the article is off line. No copyvios found on the material available on line, though I did not have access to offline sources for checking. For readers unfamiliar with "Mach" terminology it may be worth considering amending the hook to read: