The result was: promoted by
PrimalMustelid
talk 22:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 12 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.— MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 09:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC).
From Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction#Sourcing and quotations, "The plot summary for a work, on a page about that work, does not need to be sourced with in-line citations, as it is generally assumed that the work itself is the primary source for the plot summary." However, Clean is a documentary, not a work of fiction, so that guideline is not fully applicable. To err on the safe side, I recommend adding sources to that section so that there is no question that WP:DYKCITE is met. Sourcing is needed to comply with DYK guidelines since the information about her being "a former sex worker, drag queen, and crime scene cleaner" is not sourced in the article. WP:DYKCITE says, "The facts of the hook in the article should be cited no later than the end of the sentence in which they appear."
The lead contains information that is not sourced in the body of the article. For example, the release month in "Clean was released in Australia in June 2022" is unsourced. The sentence "It was nominated for two awards at the Australian Academy of Cinema and Television Arts Awards in 2022" is unsourced also. I recommend going through the lead to confirm that everything is sourced (or is mentioned in the body of the article and is sourced there).
Here is an alternative hook that tightens MaxnaCarta's proposed alternative and removes the euphemism:
... ALT1: that the posthumously released documentary Clean centered on the life of Sandra Pankhurst, a former sex worker, drag queen, and crime scene cleaner?
As I am proposing an alternative hook, Schwede66 or another reviewer will be needed to review the wording. Cunard ( talk) 09:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Hook is sourced to the plot section, which technically doesn't need it per
WP:PLOTCITE. I'm going to say that
WP:DYKHFC overrides this and say that 'for the hook, you need a cite'.--
Laun
chba
ller 09:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
PrimalMustelid
talk 22:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 12 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.— MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 09:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC).
From Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction#Sourcing and quotations, "The plot summary for a work, on a page about that work, does not need to be sourced with in-line citations, as it is generally assumed that the work itself is the primary source for the plot summary." However, Clean is a documentary, not a work of fiction, so that guideline is not fully applicable. To err on the safe side, I recommend adding sources to that section so that there is no question that WP:DYKCITE is met. Sourcing is needed to comply with DYK guidelines since the information about her being "a former sex worker, drag queen, and crime scene cleaner" is not sourced in the article. WP:DYKCITE says, "The facts of the hook in the article should be cited no later than the end of the sentence in which they appear."
The lead contains information that is not sourced in the body of the article. For example, the release month in "Clean was released in Australia in June 2022" is unsourced. The sentence "It was nominated for two awards at the Australian Academy of Cinema and Television Arts Awards in 2022" is unsourced also. I recommend going through the lead to confirm that everything is sourced (or is mentioned in the body of the article and is sourced there).
Here is an alternative hook that tightens MaxnaCarta's proposed alternative and removes the euphemism:
... ALT1: that the posthumously released documentary Clean centered on the life of Sandra Pankhurst, a former sex worker, drag queen, and crime scene cleaner?
As I am proposing an alternative hook, Schwede66 or another reviewer will be needed to review the wording. Cunard ( talk) 09:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Hook is sourced to the plot section, which technically doesn't need it per
WP:PLOTCITE. I'm going to say that
WP:DYKHFC overrides this and say that 'for the hook, you need a cite'.--
Laun
chba
ller 09:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)