The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by JollyΩJanner 04:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
... that a new
Marvel Comics character with the power to predict the outcome of future events will be introduced in Civil War II, the upcoming sequel to Civil War?
ALT1 ... that a new
Marvel Comics character, with the power to predict future events, will be introduced in Civil War II, the sequel to Civil War?
Created by
TriiipleThreat (
talk). Self-nominated at 21:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC).
Comment only More concise ALT1 added.
Edwardx (
talk) 23:11, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. Either hook could be used according to the promoter's choice of wording. The article is neutral and appears to be within policy.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 18:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by JollyΩJanner 04:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
... that a new
Marvel Comics character with the power to predict the outcome of future events will be introduced in Civil War II, the upcoming sequel to Civil War?
ALT1 ... that a new
Marvel Comics character, with the power to predict future events, will be introduced in Civil War II, the sequel to Civil War?
Created by
TriiipleThreat (
talk). Self-nominated at 21:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC).
Comment only More concise ALT1 added.
Edwardx (
talk) 23:11, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. Either hook could be used according to the promoter's choice of wording. The article is neutral and appears to be within policy.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 18:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)