The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Created by
Fredlyfish4 (
talk). Self nominated at 01:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC).
Fine for length, recently created, no copyvios or other glaring issues. Moderately interesting hook (I prefer the first one to the alternative) and supported by the cited source. It's fractionally too long; I recommend dropping a couple of words ("estimated" and "individuals" aren't really necessary), but otherwise fine. Picture is hi-res, PD and rather good, I'd definitely be in favour of using it. No QPQ review - if this is one of your first forays into DYK please just make a note of that; otherwise this is good to go once the QPQ review is done.
Comment: I removed the recommended words, and this is my second DYK.
Fredlyfish4 (
talk) 12:45, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
No worries, then. Clear for take-off!
Yunshui雲
水 12:54, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Created by
Fredlyfish4 (
talk). Self nominated at 01:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC).
Fine for length, recently created, no copyvios or other glaring issues. Moderately interesting hook (I prefer the first one to the alternative) and supported by the cited source. It's fractionally too long; I recommend dropping a couple of words ("estimated" and "individuals" aren't really necessary), but otherwise fine. Picture is hi-res, PD and rather good, I'd definitely be in favour of using it. No QPQ review - if this is one of your first forays into DYK please just make a note of that; otherwise this is good to go once the QPQ review is done.
Comment: I removed the recommended words, and this is my second DYK.
Fredlyfish4 (
talk) 12:45, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
No worries, then. Clear for take-off!
Yunshui雲
水 12:54, 30 May 2013 (UTC)