The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 09:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Article is newly created and is of acceptable length. QPQ provided. Article and hook are well cited; however, I don't find mention of Paranthropus boisei in source 2, which is provided to support the hook.
FrB.TG (
talk) 11:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Doh! You are correct. The species was actually originally named Zinjanthropus boisei. I have cited this in the article. The hook should be changed to suit this -
Dumelow (
talk) 17:40, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Perfect then. This should be good to go! (on a side note
this did not reveal any evidence of close paraphrasing) FrB.TG (
talk) 16:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 09:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Article is newly created and is of acceptable length. QPQ provided. Article and hook are well cited; however, I don't find mention of Paranthropus boisei in source 2, which is provided to support the hook.
FrB.TG (
talk) 11:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Doh! You are correct. The species was actually originally named Zinjanthropus boisei. I have cited this in the article. The hook should be changed to suit this -
Dumelow (
talk) 17:40, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Perfect then. This should be good to go! (on a side note
this did not reveal any evidence of close paraphrasing) FrB.TG (
talk) 16:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)