The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 05:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
... that a recent event sponsored by the Charles Koch Institute was described as more like "a left-wing anti-war rally than a gathering hosted by a longtime right-wing institution"?
Comment: per a recent ANI decision, two review of this are required
Created by
LavaBaron (
talk). Self-nominated at 08:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC).
[1 of 2] New enough, long enough. All paragraphs have citations, and the hook is interesting (to an American reader, particularly) and contains an actual quote from the article. Double QPQ present. Good to go with a confirming review.
Raymie (
t •
c) 07:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
[2 of 2] This article is new enough and long enough. The hook fact is well sourced, the article is neutral, and my spot checks did not disclose any copyright issues.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 08:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 05:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
... that a recent event sponsored by the Charles Koch Institute was described as more like "a left-wing anti-war rally than a gathering hosted by a longtime right-wing institution"?
Comment: per a recent ANI decision, two review of this are required
Created by
LavaBaron (
talk). Self-nominated at 08:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC).
[1 of 2] New enough, long enough. All paragraphs have citations, and the hook is interesting (to an American reader, particularly) and contains an actual quote from the article. Double QPQ present. Good to go with a confirming review.
Raymie (
t •
c) 07:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
[2 of 2] This article is new enough and long enough. The hook fact is well sourced, the article is neutral, and my spot checks did not disclose any copyright issues.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 08:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)