The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Improved to Good Article status by Jackdude101 ( talk). Self-nominated at 02:35, 24 January 2018 (UTC).
:*
Newly promoted to GA, article of required length, use of free images, cited and interesting hook. (QPQ not required as nominator had promoted 3 DYKs till now).
RRD (
talk) 08:51, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Let's see, Gatoclass changed the article with the edit summary " tweak to conform with DYK hook", without changing the off-line hook they presumably haven't read. That seems like rather atrocious behaviour. The hook should follow the article, not the article follow the hook they promoted. It's best to get some uninvolved editors in to check this again and look at how this has been dealt with, instead of letting Gatoclass continue to trample all normal editing rules to get what he wants.
Fram (
talk) 16:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
@ Gatoclass: The general consensus with this DYK is that other people not involved with it until now should review it. I pinged a couple of other users over the past few days and asked them to do so, but no one has responded. I propose that this DYK be moved back to WP:DYKN and strike the original review by Royroydeb above so that it can be reviewed again from the start. Once it becomes approved again, I suggest that the alternate hook be used on the main page, just because of the hornets nest that my original hook unintentionally stirred up. Jackdude101 talk cont 02:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
New review needed to confirm recently added alternate hook.
Jackdude101
talk
cont 21:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Improved to Good Article status by Jackdude101 ( talk). Self-nominated at 02:35, 24 January 2018 (UTC).
:*
Newly promoted to GA, article of required length, use of free images, cited and interesting hook. (QPQ not required as nominator had promoted 3 DYKs till now).
RRD (
talk) 08:51, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Let's see, Gatoclass changed the article with the edit summary " tweak to conform with DYK hook", without changing the off-line hook they presumably haven't read. That seems like rather atrocious behaviour. The hook should follow the article, not the article follow the hook they promoted. It's best to get some uninvolved editors in to check this again and look at how this has been dealt with, instead of letting Gatoclass continue to trample all normal editing rules to get what he wants.
Fram (
talk) 16:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
@ Gatoclass: The general consensus with this DYK is that other people not involved with it until now should review it. I pinged a couple of other users over the past few days and asked them to do so, but no one has responded. I propose that this DYK be moved back to WP:DYKN and strike the original review by Royroydeb above so that it can be reviewed again from the start. Once it becomes approved again, I suggest that the alternate hook be used on the main page, just because of the hornets nest that my original hook unintentionally stirred up. Jackdude101 talk cont 02:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
New review needed to confirm recently added alternate hook.
Jackdude101
talk
cont 21:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC)