The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 11:34, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Neutral, close paraphrasing, unsourced - Y, again absolutely fine.
Verify - Y, hook referenced in the first reference itself.
Hook - This is my area of concern, the hook fails to hook on to the readers interest, more so if the reader is unaware of
Swami Vivekananda and his works. Sohambanerjee1998 13:19, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Added descriptor. Tito☸Dutta 15:22, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Now it looks better, though some more information about the two religions or even the use of word religion could make the hook better. At the time being its of 106 characters, well below the 200 KAR limit. Sohambanerjee1998 15:31, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Not needed, I think. Tito☸Dutta 15:34, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Sounds good, but, if you suggest hook, you'll not be able to review the nomination anymore. --Tito☸Dutta 15:45, 26 September 2013 (UTC) No, that "extension", "actually' are not needed. --Tito☸Dutta 15:46, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Fine leave it looks good the way it is. Except for the fact that Hindu means Indian, therefore the Indian at the beginning should be dropped. Sohambanerjee1998 15:52, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Will give it one good look and then I'll list whatever the issues (there will hardly be any) are present. Tomorrow. Sohambanerjee1998 16:02, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Check it for tense, spellings etc. just to be sure. Other than that and the removal of Indian in the hook its good to go. Will give the final verdict when these are resolved. Sohambanerjee1998 16:13, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Hindu does not mean Indian. Tito☸Dutta 19:57, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
I know it does'n't mean it but the Indian seems a bit redundant. Sohambanerjee1998 05:12, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Tito and
Nv, I will go for a Wiki-break soon. Therefore I want to complete it soon. Please remove the Indian as it is redundant so that I can give it the go. Sohambanerjee1998 14:15, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
I don't want to keep "Hindu" only, I may remove both Hindu and Indian. Tito☸Dutta 14:25, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Anyway its good to go. Sohambanerjee1998 08:47, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 11:34, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Neutral, close paraphrasing, unsourced - Y, again absolutely fine.
Verify - Y, hook referenced in the first reference itself.
Hook - This is my area of concern, the hook fails to hook on to the readers interest, more so if the reader is unaware of
Swami Vivekananda and his works. Sohambanerjee1998 13:19, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Added descriptor. Tito☸Dutta 15:22, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Now it looks better, though some more information about the two religions or even the use of word religion could make the hook better. At the time being its of 106 characters, well below the 200 KAR limit. Sohambanerjee1998 15:31, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Not needed, I think. Tito☸Dutta 15:34, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Sounds good, but, if you suggest hook, you'll not be able to review the nomination anymore. --Tito☸Dutta 15:45, 26 September 2013 (UTC) No, that "extension", "actually' are not needed. --Tito☸Dutta 15:46, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Fine leave it looks good the way it is. Except for the fact that Hindu means Indian, therefore the Indian at the beginning should be dropped. Sohambanerjee1998 15:52, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Will give it one good look and then I'll list whatever the issues (there will hardly be any) are present. Tomorrow. Sohambanerjee1998 16:02, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Check it for tense, spellings etc. just to be sure. Other than that and the removal of Indian in the hook its good to go. Will give the final verdict when these are resolved. Sohambanerjee1998 16:13, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Hindu does not mean Indian. Tito☸Dutta 19:57, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
I know it does'n't mean it but the Indian seems a bit redundant. Sohambanerjee1998 05:12, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Tito and
Nv, I will go for a Wiki-break soon. Therefore I want to complete it soon. Please remove the Indian as it is redundant so that I can give it the go. Sohambanerjee1998 14:15, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
I don't want to keep "Hindu" only, I may remove both Hindu and Indian. Tito☸Dutta 14:25, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Anyway its good to go. Sohambanerjee1998 08:47, 28 September 2013 (UTC)