The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 20:41, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
... that according to the Brahma Upanishad,
Prana is drawn into the
Brahman through the nerve chords in a similar way a
falcon considers the sky as means of communication to reach its abode?
ALT ... that according to the Brahma Upanishad, a
living being controls all the senses similar to a spider, which weaves its web (pictured) with a single thread?
The hooks are interesting in that they grab my attention and make me curious to read the article; however I don't think either of them, particularly hook 1, really makes sense to someone not familiar with the Hindu religion. Reading the article does little to clarify things. That said, interesting is a matter of taste. However, I'd still like this to be more approachable to someone who knows nothing about Hindu.
Accurate and cited with in-line citation.
(Hook 1 has a citation at the end of the paragraph containing the hook, but not a citation to the specific sentence. Hook 2 is properly cited.)
Neutral and free of BLP vios
Other
QPQ - not done, and nominator claims over 1,000 DYKs
Images free, used in article, and appropriately sized.
Overall, I prefer Hook 2. My objection under "interesting" should not preclude this from being on the main page, but is something to think about in revising the article. Do a QPQ (might I suggest
Template:Did you know nominations/Hammerton Killick?) and I think this is good to go. ~ ONUnicorn(
Talk;
Contribs)problem solving 19:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
ONUnicorn, QPQ Belgrade printing house (see Reviewed) is already done. Striking out hook 1. Please pass hook 2 (ALT).
RedtigerxyzTalk 19:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Whoops, I didn't see that reviewed note there. Not sure how I missed it. Sorry. ~ ONUnicorn(
Talk|
Contribs)problem solving 19:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Not sure what you mean, unless you just want me to put another big green check mark like I just did. ~ ONUnicorn(
Talk|
Contribs)problem solving 20:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes, that confirmed green tick. Thanks.
RedtigerxyzTalk 20:11, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 20:41, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
... that according to the Brahma Upanishad,
Prana is drawn into the
Brahman through the nerve chords in a similar way a
falcon considers the sky as means of communication to reach its abode?
ALT ... that according to the Brahma Upanishad, a
living being controls all the senses similar to a spider, which weaves its web (pictured) with a single thread?
The hooks are interesting in that they grab my attention and make me curious to read the article; however I don't think either of them, particularly hook 1, really makes sense to someone not familiar with the Hindu religion. Reading the article does little to clarify things. That said, interesting is a matter of taste. However, I'd still like this to be more approachable to someone who knows nothing about Hindu.
Accurate and cited with in-line citation.
(Hook 1 has a citation at the end of the paragraph containing the hook, but not a citation to the specific sentence. Hook 2 is properly cited.)
Neutral and free of BLP vios
Other
QPQ - not done, and nominator claims over 1,000 DYKs
Images free, used in article, and appropriately sized.
Overall, I prefer Hook 2. My objection under "interesting" should not preclude this from being on the main page, but is something to think about in revising the article. Do a QPQ (might I suggest
Template:Did you know nominations/Hammerton Killick?) and I think this is good to go. ~ ONUnicorn(
Talk;
Contribs)problem solving 19:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
ONUnicorn, QPQ Belgrade printing house (see Reviewed) is already done. Striking out hook 1. Please pass hook 2 (ALT).
RedtigerxyzTalk 19:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Whoops, I didn't see that reviewed note there. Not sure how I missed it. Sorry. ~ ONUnicorn(
Talk|
Contribs)problem solving 19:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Not sure what you mean, unless you just want me to put another big green check mark like I just did. ~ ONUnicorn(
Talk|
Contribs)problem solving 20:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes, that confirmed green tick. Thanks.
RedtigerxyzTalk 20:11, 18 February 2015 (UTC)