The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Montanabw(talk) 06:12, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Created by
Lagrange613 (
talk). Self-nominated at 23:57, 4 July 2015 (UTC).
(First review, be nice.
) New article, length good, tone good, sourcing appears good. Article relies—a lot—on a publication that requires purchase, but I was able to verify hook via: Kytle, Ethan J., Romantic Reformers (2014), p. 258. QPQ done. Change "a debut reading" to "its debut reading", and good to go. —
ATinySliver/
ATalkPage 🖖 05:57, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Montanabw(talk) 06:12, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Created by
Lagrange613 (
talk). Self-nominated at 23:57, 4 July 2015 (UTC).
(First review, be nice.
) New article, length good, tone good, sourcing appears good. Article relies—a lot—on a publication that requires purchase, but I was able to verify hook via: Kytle, Ethan J., Romantic Reformers (2014), p. 258. QPQ done. Change "a debut reading" to "its debut reading", and good to go. —
ATinySliver/
ATalkPage 🖖 05:57, 5 July 2015 (UTC)