The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PumpkinSkytalk 23:40, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Comment: For some reason, only the first 8 articles show up in the nomination title and article history links (perhaps that's the template max?)
Created/expanded by
Sasata (
talk). Self nom at 07:23, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Yes, that's the template max. I manually inserted the three additional articles into the section heading and added article history links and DYKmakes.
MANdARAX•XAЯAbИAM 00:46, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Hook fact good, present and referenced in all articles. Hook length acceptable per multi-nomination guidelines. New articles long enough, expanded articles meet 5x requirements. No policy issues found, and references are good with offline references taken AGF. Looks good, with a lot of effort taken! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Kevmin (
talk •
contribs) 21:22, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PumpkinSkytalk 23:40, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Comment: For some reason, only the first 8 articles show up in the nomination title and article history links (perhaps that's the template max?)
Created/expanded by
Sasata (
talk). Self nom at 07:23, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Yes, that's the template max. I manually inserted the three additional articles into the section heading and added article history links and DYKmakes.
MANdARAX•XAЯAbИAM 00:46, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Hook fact good, present and referenced in all articles. Hook length acceptable per multi-nomination guidelines. New articles long enough, expanded articles meet 5x requirements. No policy issues found, and references are good with offline references taken AGF. Looks good, with a lot of effort taken! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Kevmin (
talk •
contribs) 21:22, 18 October 2012 (UTC)