The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
... that
Stanko Bilinski's 1960 rediscovery of the Bilinski dodecahedron(pictured) corrected a 75-year-old omission from the list of convex polyhedra with congruent
rhombic faces?
Created by
David Eppstein (
talk). Self-nominated at 23:41, 28 May 2016 (UTC).
correct person credited, as earlier version was only a redirect. Article is big, new and cited enough. QPQ performed. Hook is in the article with a reference. Confirmed by a reference. Does not look to be a hoax.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 08:32, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
... that
Stanko Bilinski's 1960 rediscovery of the Bilinski dodecahedron(pictured) corrected a 75-year-old omission from the list of convex polyhedra with congruent
rhombic faces?
Created by
David Eppstein (
talk). Self-nominated at 23:41, 28 May 2016 (UTC).
correct person credited, as earlier version was only a redirect. Article is big, new and cited enough. QPQ performed. Hook is in the article with a reference. Confirmed by a reference. Does not look to be a hoax.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 08:32, 31 May 2016 (UTC)