The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 04:59, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
The article expansion is new and long enough. No POV or plagiarism detected. Meets the citation guideline. QPQ has been provided. The hook is interesting and cited to 2 sources. Good to Go. --
Skr15081997 (
talk) 02:54, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Re-opened as the hook, while having two sources, one does not provide the 36th in the list reference, the other is not a reliable source.
The Rambling Man (
talk) 08:02, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Bloody hell, Gerda, all I did was add a category and fix a broken wikilink. Why must I be pressed into service 7 years later because of that? Here is the official list of the top ten from the 2003 listeners' poll:
[1]. Here is the entire numbered list from the 2003 listeners' poll:
[2] (posted online prior to the wiki article's creation). --
Softlavender (
talk) 10:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
@
The Rambling Man: A workable citation for ALT0 has now been added to the article.
Softlavender (
talk) 11:25, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Superseding the tick pending further review.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 14:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
I added an image, with thanks to Softlavender for generous help, --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 13:12, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Good to go. The promoter can choose ALT0 or ALT1; I'm not too fond of ALT2, a bit wordy. The other two check out fine.
Montanabw(talk) 03:31, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 04:59, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
The article expansion is new and long enough. No POV or plagiarism detected. Meets the citation guideline. QPQ has been provided. The hook is interesting and cited to 2 sources. Good to Go. --
Skr15081997 (
talk) 02:54, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Re-opened as the hook, while having two sources, one does not provide the 36th in the list reference, the other is not a reliable source.
The Rambling Man (
talk) 08:02, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Bloody hell, Gerda, all I did was add a category and fix a broken wikilink. Why must I be pressed into service 7 years later because of that? Here is the official list of the top ten from the 2003 listeners' poll:
[1]. Here is the entire numbered list from the 2003 listeners' poll:
[2] (posted online prior to the wiki article's creation). --
Softlavender (
talk) 10:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
@
The Rambling Man: A workable citation for ALT0 has now been added to the article.
Softlavender (
talk) 11:25, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Superseding the tick pending further review.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 14:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
I added an image, with thanks to Softlavender for generous help, --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 13:12, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Good to go. The promoter can choose ALT0 or ALT1; I'm not too fond of ALT2, a bit wordy. The other two check out fine.
Montanabw(talk) 03:31, 11 August 2016 (UTC)