The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 22:59, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
... that after Seleucid king
Antiochus XII was slain by the
Nabataeans during the Battle of Cana, his demoralized army fled and died from starvation in the desert?
Created by
Makeandtoss (
talk). Self-nominated at 13:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC).
I can only see sources 1 and 3, neither of which support "his demoralized army fled and died from starvation in the desert", which is referenced to 3.
Johnbod (
talk) 18:11, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Ok, now I can see all 3 sources, I'm wondering where "Although the balance of the events in the battle was tipped towards a victory for the Seleucids, Antiochus was slain by an Arab soldier during combat and the battle became a decisive Nabataean victory." comes from. The first bit is also repeated in the article, and not very idiomatic English, so might be dropped.
Johnbod (
talk) 02:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Its in the second source.
Makeandtoss (
talk) 10:26, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
That says they were "set to win" the campaign, until the battle. Not the same.
Johnbod (
talk) 10:46, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
"Killed in action" makes it sound as the campaign.
Makeandtoss (
talk) 10:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No that sounds like the battle, given the other sources. But this source (2) doesn't mention the battle at all, just the campaign, so you can't source the dramatic turn-around in the battle the article describes to her.
Johnbod (
talk) 01:38, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 22:59, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
... that after Seleucid king
Antiochus XII was slain by the
Nabataeans during the Battle of Cana, his demoralized army fled and died from starvation in the desert?
Created by
Makeandtoss (
talk). Self-nominated at 13:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC).
I can only see sources 1 and 3, neither of which support "his demoralized army fled and died from starvation in the desert", which is referenced to 3.
Johnbod (
talk) 18:11, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Ok, now I can see all 3 sources, I'm wondering where "Although the balance of the events in the battle was tipped towards a victory for the Seleucids, Antiochus was slain by an Arab soldier during combat and the battle became a decisive Nabataean victory." comes from. The first bit is also repeated in the article, and not very idiomatic English, so might be dropped.
Johnbod (
talk) 02:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Its in the second source.
Makeandtoss (
talk) 10:26, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
That says they were "set to win" the campaign, until the battle. Not the same.
Johnbod (
talk) 10:46, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
"Killed in action" makes it sound as the campaign.
Makeandtoss (
talk) 10:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
No that sounds like the battle, given the other sources. But this source (2) doesn't mention the battle at all, just the campaign, so you can't source the dramatic turn-around in the battle the article describes to her.
Johnbod (
talk) 01:38, 18 July 2016 (UTC)