The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk) 00:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
... that parts of Basilica of Our Lady of Hungary was thought to be Gothic until wall probes showed otherwise? Source: Bozóki L., „Gótikus” építkezés a XVIII. században Márianosztrán. [’Gothic’ construction in the 18th century in Márianosztra]. Műemlékvédelem, XLVII/2, 128-132 (2003).
"The church in today's form is by architect Zsigmond Berényi, from the beginning of the 18th century." Weird sentence, needs to be rewritten.
"The sanctuary was thought to be Gothic until Lajos Bozóki probed its walls in 1990 and 1999 and found that the whole sanctuary was built in the 18th century." How does it being made in the 18th century prove it wasn't gothic?
"The message of these medieval-like forms can easily be interpreted: the settlement of the Pauline Order in Márianosztra is not some kind of new beginning but the continuation of the medieval life of the monastery." This quote needs to be attributed to someone.
What makes GCatholic and Magyar Katolikus Lexikon reliable sources?
These are going to need to be fixed.
Onegreatjoke (
talk) 22:29, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
3. The quote is by art historian Gergely Domonkos Nagy.
4. GCatholic is a non-profit database 25 years online, quite reliable for this type of information. Magyar Katolikus Lexikon is an online version of a 15 volume printed encyclopedia, see
https://szitkonyvek.hu/termek/104Jan Spousta (
talk) 10:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk) 00:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
... that parts of Basilica of Our Lady of Hungary was thought to be Gothic until wall probes showed otherwise? Source: Bozóki L., „Gótikus” építkezés a XVIII. században Márianosztrán. [’Gothic’ construction in the 18th century in Márianosztra]. Műemlékvédelem, XLVII/2, 128-132 (2003).
"The church in today's form is by architect Zsigmond Berényi, from the beginning of the 18th century." Weird sentence, needs to be rewritten.
"The sanctuary was thought to be Gothic until Lajos Bozóki probed its walls in 1990 and 1999 and found that the whole sanctuary was built in the 18th century." How does it being made in the 18th century prove it wasn't gothic?
"The message of these medieval-like forms can easily be interpreted: the settlement of the Pauline Order in Márianosztra is not some kind of new beginning but the continuation of the medieval life of the monastery." This quote needs to be attributed to someone.
What makes GCatholic and Magyar Katolikus Lexikon reliable sources?
These are going to need to be fixed.
Onegreatjoke (
talk) 22:29, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
3. The quote is by art historian Gergely Domonkos Nagy.
4. GCatholic is a non-profit database 25 years online, quite reliable for this type of information. Magyar Katolikus Lexikon is an online version of a 15 volume printed encyclopedia, see
https://szitkonyvek.hu/termek/104Jan Spousta (
talk) 10:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)