The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 02:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
5x expanded by Atlantis536 ( talk). Nominated by Lucluc97 ( talk) at 22:35, 30 November 2022 (UTC).
@
Lucluc97: Unfortunately for now I have to reject; the prose size (using
User:Shubinator/DYKcheck) is 1100 characters; short of the 1500 minimum. The article would have to also be no longer classified as a stub. I do like
Atlantis536's ALT1 if the article can qualify in the future with additional expansion, however.
Umimmak (
talk) 00:20, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
It was largely ignored in modern literature until Dai et al.'s 2022 description, or that he Dai discussed it
at length. Also when you cite an entire book like Li et al 1999, it's nice to have page numbers. And per WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT are you citing Hui's 1989 paper or Will Downs's 2001 English translation? Ideally this would be a bit clearer but I don't think any of these are dealbreakers.
Reviewing...
Flibirigit (
talk) 18:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
Article was first expanded on November 26, and nominated within seven days. The length is now adequate after the subsequent expansion. The article is neutral in tone. The hook is interesting to a broad audience, properly mentioned in the article, and accepted by AGF. No images are used in the article. QPQ is not required as the nominator has no DYK credits. Sourcing is good, except for the following question. In the first sentence of the introduction it states, "Bashunosaurus (meaning "Bashun lizard")", but I cannot find a citation for that anywhere in the article.
Flibirigit (
talk) 18:33, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 02:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
5x expanded by Atlantis536 ( talk). Nominated by Lucluc97 ( talk) at 22:35, 30 November 2022 (UTC).
@
Lucluc97: Unfortunately for now I have to reject; the prose size (using
User:Shubinator/DYKcheck) is 1100 characters; short of the 1500 minimum. The article would have to also be no longer classified as a stub. I do like
Atlantis536's ALT1 if the article can qualify in the future with additional expansion, however.
Umimmak (
talk) 00:20, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
It was largely ignored in modern literature until Dai et al.'s 2022 description, or that he Dai discussed it
at length. Also when you cite an entire book like Li et al 1999, it's nice to have page numbers. And per WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT are you citing Hui's 1989 paper or Will Downs's 2001 English translation? Ideally this would be a bit clearer but I don't think any of these are dealbreakers.
Reviewing...
Flibirigit (
talk) 18:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
Article was first expanded on November 26, and nominated within seven days. The length is now adequate after the subsequent expansion. The article is neutral in tone. The hook is interesting to a broad audience, properly mentioned in the article, and accepted by AGF. No images are used in the article. QPQ is not required as the nominator has no DYK credits. Sourcing is good, except for the following question. In the first sentence of the introduction it states, "Bashunosaurus (meaning "Bashun lizard")", but I cannot find a citation for that anywhere in the article.
Flibirigit (
talk) 18:33, 1 January 2023 (UTC)