The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that Banbhore is an ancient port city in
Pakistan, dating back to first century BC, which contains remains of one of the earliest mosques (pictured) in the region.
Created/expanded by
Samar (
talk). Self nom at 18:58, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- Article itself passes as new and long enough, etc., and images is of the proper license. Problem is the hook. The sentence in the article covering the main fact about the mosque is cited to footnotes 2 and 3, and neither support the claim. Elsewhere, there is a claim related to earliest, but it is in reference to best preserved, and that is supported by footnote 1. Need to find a source or change the hook.
Aboutmovies (
talk) 07:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
I am sorry, there was another reference from ArchNet which I missed. I have added it now.
SamarTalk 07:40, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- All good to go know with ref added to support the earliest portion.
Aboutmovies (
talk) 17:06, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that Banbhore is an ancient port city in
Pakistan, dating back to first century BC, which contains remains of one of the earliest mosques (pictured) in the region.
Created/expanded by
Samar (
talk). Self nom at 18:58, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- Article itself passes as new and long enough, etc., and images is of the proper license. Problem is the hook. The sentence in the article covering the main fact about the mosque is cited to footnotes 2 and 3, and neither support the claim. Elsewhere, there is a claim related to earliest, but it is in reference to best preserved, and that is supported by footnote 1. Need to find a source or change the hook.
Aboutmovies (
talk) 07:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
I am sorry, there was another reference from ArchNet which I missed. I have added it now.
SamarTalk 07:40, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- All good to go know with ref added to support the earliest portion.
Aboutmovies (
talk) 17:06, 8 September 2012 (UTC)