The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Created by
Dr.K. (
talk). Self-nominated at 20:08, 3 September 2017 (UTC).
The only issues I have is the QPQ and the missing citations for the last three sentences of the second paragraph. The article is rather short, but nonetheless, it does meet the length criteria. There's no POV violations, if that's even possible with an article like this. This page was created on August 29, so it's within the 7-day period.--
12george1 (
talk) 20:17, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi
12george1. Thank you for your review. For the four densest dune fields in the northern circumpolar region of Mars, please see:
File:Distribution of dune fields in the Planum Boreum region.PNG and the associated
paper. For the five named dune fields on Mars, please see
List_of_extraterrestrial_dune_fields#Mars. I know Wikipedia is not a reliable source, but it is a fact that there are no other dune fields on Mars named by the
International Astronomical Union. As far as Aspledon Undae lying on Vastitas Borealis (the northern wastelands of Mars), please see
this map and
associated pdf. Another proof that Aspledon lies on Vastitas Borealis, is the cited fact that
Siton Undae, to the north of Aspledon, also lies on Vastitas; please see Siton's article for the citation. I know, this may be not too strong for a reference, but it is also rather simple to discern. In any case, I added
sources to these sentences. Meanwhile, please let me know if my explanations sound ok to you, otherwise I may have to remove these sentences, although, they are widely accepted, and easily verifiable. I also have done my QpQ now by reviewing
Template:Did you know nominations/James Amster. Thank you.
Dr.K. 04:56, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Closing per
12george1's review, as the sentences are now cited and the QPQ complete. --
Usernameunique (
talk) 21:19, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Created by
Dr.K. (
talk). Self-nominated at 20:08, 3 September 2017 (UTC).
The only issues I have is the QPQ and the missing citations for the last three sentences of the second paragraph. The article is rather short, but nonetheless, it does meet the length criteria. There's no POV violations, if that's even possible with an article like this. This page was created on August 29, so it's within the 7-day period.--
12george1 (
talk) 20:17, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi
12george1. Thank you for your review. For the four densest dune fields in the northern circumpolar region of Mars, please see:
File:Distribution of dune fields in the Planum Boreum region.PNG and the associated
paper. For the five named dune fields on Mars, please see
List_of_extraterrestrial_dune_fields#Mars. I know Wikipedia is not a reliable source, but it is a fact that there are no other dune fields on Mars named by the
International Astronomical Union. As far as Aspledon Undae lying on Vastitas Borealis (the northern wastelands of Mars), please see
this map and
associated pdf. Another proof that Aspledon lies on Vastitas Borealis, is the cited fact that
Siton Undae, to the north of Aspledon, also lies on Vastitas; please see Siton's article for the citation. I know, this may be not too strong for a reference, but it is also rather simple to discern. In any case, I added
sources to these sentences. Meanwhile, please let me know if my explanations sound ok to you, otherwise I may have to remove these sentences, although, they are widely accepted, and easily verifiable. I also have done my QpQ now by reviewing
Template:Did you know nominations/James Amster. Thank you.
Dr.K. 04:56, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Closing per
12george1's review, as the sentences are now cited and the QPQ complete. --
Usernameunique (
talk) 21:19, 4 September 2017 (UTC)