The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 06:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Other problems: - ALT0 is misleading since there is an article titled
Omelette de la mère Poulard, and the proposed hook would make it seem that the link is pointing to the omelette page. ALT1 is fine for this reason. I wonder if we can clarify where
Mont-Saint-Michel is.
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Thanks for starting review,
Epicgenius, I've added France to ALT1. And yes, I just created the omelette stub this morning, I was thinking the same thing! --
valereee (
talk) 18:09, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
@
Valereee: No problem.
Omelette de la mère Poulard just falls short of eligibility by 500 characters, but if you do have additional information to add to bring it past the 1500-byte limit, I'll check it. Let me know what you think.
epicgenius (
talk) 19:09, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Epicgenius, that would be great! I don't think I've ever done a double hook. I think I've got it (barely) to the min, and I have another review I can spend if it looks like it's going to make the cut. Thanks! --
valereee (
talk) 21:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
@
Valereee: No problem, here's the review for the omelette article.
epicgenius (
talk) 01:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Overall: ** The "match" in Earwig's copyvio detector is actually the French quote. Not sure if we need that.
1514 characters for the omelette article (minus the quote) and 2600 characters for Mother Poulard article (minus overlapping), means that both are long enough.
Epicgenius, I've added the photo to the omelette article, too. It actually fits there, since we included the quote about her recipe. Removed the french version; maybe I'll put it into a note so people can read the original french in case they question the translation. Added the second QPQ above. --
valereee (
talk) 09:54, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
OK. I think this is good to go again.
epicgenius (
talk) 13:24, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
epicgenius (
talk) 01:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately given the amount of copying between articles the omelette article is short of the required original prose count.
Nikkimaria (
talk) 10:31, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Summoned here by bot; sorry, didn't see it go by. If we wait a little longer I can bring it up to snuff. I'm out of town right now with terrible internet so am not able to do much productive edting. I have no objection to dropping the omelette article to unbolded if anyone's in a hurry, though, either. --
valereee (
talk) 10:27, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
valereee, there are currently 127 approved nominations waiting to be promoted to prep, almost 16 days worth. We should absolutely wait for you to return and do the article expansion when you're ready.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 20:13, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Epicgenius I think I've addressed
Nikkimaria's concerns, if you want to recheck! --
valereee (
talk) 13:36, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Approved. The expanded omelette article is 2.3k bytes in prose, with about 400 bytes shared between the two articles. The rest of the review is per the above.
epicgenius (
talk) 13:45, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 06:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Other problems: - ALT0 is misleading since there is an article titled
Omelette de la mère Poulard, and the proposed hook would make it seem that the link is pointing to the omelette page. ALT1 is fine for this reason. I wonder if we can clarify where
Mont-Saint-Michel is.
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Thanks for starting review,
Epicgenius, I've added France to ALT1. And yes, I just created the omelette stub this morning, I was thinking the same thing! --
valereee (
talk) 18:09, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
@
Valereee: No problem.
Omelette de la mère Poulard just falls short of eligibility by 500 characters, but if you do have additional information to add to bring it past the 1500-byte limit, I'll check it. Let me know what you think.
epicgenius (
talk) 19:09, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Epicgenius, that would be great! I don't think I've ever done a double hook. I think I've got it (barely) to the min, and I have another review I can spend if it looks like it's going to make the cut. Thanks! --
valereee (
talk) 21:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
@
Valereee: No problem, here's the review for the omelette article.
epicgenius (
talk) 01:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Overall: ** The "match" in Earwig's copyvio detector is actually the French quote. Not sure if we need that.
1514 characters for the omelette article (minus the quote) and 2600 characters for Mother Poulard article (minus overlapping), means that both are long enough.
Epicgenius, I've added the photo to the omelette article, too. It actually fits there, since we included the quote about her recipe. Removed the french version; maybe I'll put it into a note so people can read the original french in case they question the translation. Added the second QPQ above. --
valereee (
talk) 09:54, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
OK. I think this is good to go again.
epicgenius (
talk) 13:24, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
epicgenius (
talk) 01:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately given the amount of copying between articles the omelette article is short of the required original prose count.
Nikkimaria (
talk) 10:31, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Summoned here by bot; sorry, didn't see it go by. If we wait a little longer I can bring it up to snuff. I'm out of town right now with terrible internet so am not able to do much productive edting. I have no objection to dropping the omelette article to unbolded if anyone's in a hurry, though, either. --
valereee (
talk) 10:27, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
valereee, there are currently 127 approved nominations waiting to be promoted to prep, almost 16 days worth. We should absolutely wait for you to return and do the article expansion when you're ready.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 20:13, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Epicgenius I think I've addressed
Nikkimaria's concerns, if you want to recheck! --
valereee (
talk) 13:36, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Approved. The expanded omelette article is 2.3k bytes in prose, with about 400 bytes shared between the two articles. The rest of the review is per the above.
epicgenius (
talk) 13:45, 16 October 2019 (UTC)