The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 11:56, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Comment: Did you know that Wikipedia did not have an article about the most popular book of 1773 to 1784, according to the lending records of the Bristol Library?
Moved to mainspace by
Kusma (
talk). Self-nominated at 10:04, 1 February 2022 (UTC).
Hi
Kusma, review follows: article moved to mainspace on 30 January; article is well written and cited inline throughout (with the exception of "Content", which is implicitly cited to the work itself); sources used appear reliable; I didn't find any overly close paraphrasing from sources I checked; hooks are mentioned in the article and check out to the sources cited; I find the wheelbarrow hook the most interesting; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks good to me -
Dumelow (
talk) 15:48, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 11:56, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Comment: Did you know that Wikipedia did not have an article about the most popular book of 1773 to 1784, according to the lending records of the Bristol Library?
Moved to mainspace by
Kusma (
talk). Self-nominated at 10:04, 1 February 2022 (UTC).
Hi
Kusma, review follows: article moved to mainspace on 30 January; article is well written and cited inline throughout (with the exception of "Content", which is implicitly cited to the work itself); sources used appear reliable; I didn't find any overly close paraphrasing from sources I checked; hooks are mentioned in the article and check out to the sources cited; I find the wheelbarrow hook the most interesting; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks good to me -
Dumelow (
talk) 15:48, 1 February 2022 (UTC)