The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PumpkinSkytalk 03:14, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
I Jethrobot (
talk). Self nom at 10:45, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
There is a problem with the hook. It only appears in the
WP:LEAD, which is suppose to be a summary of more detailed points made later in the main body. Nothing is suppose to appear in the LEAD that is not in the main body in greater detail.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 07:29, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Noted, and I have made appropriate changes in the body of the article.
I, Jethrobotdrop me a line (note: not a
bot!) 08:51, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
I think your references are lacking links for your reliable sources.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 01:19, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Um? I don't really know what you mean. What sources are problematic?
I, Jethrobotdrop me a line (note: not a
bot!) 03:59, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Sorry Tony, I am a little confused. The links for all the articles seem fine to me, and clicking on the article links brings you to the website of the periodical. Some of the articles are behind paywalls, but the full text of those articles is saved on the Church's website, which is why I put them there in addition to links to the paywall'd periodical website. There are also sources coming from the Church itself (e.g. information about its services), but this is not to establish notability. I'm not sure if either of these things address your concern, but otherwise, let me know in further detail about what I need to do.
I, Jethrobotdrop me a line (note: not a
bot!) 01:31, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Fix the links so that they don't redirect. I.e., use official names. Not The Chicago Tribune, just Chicago Tribune.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 22:08, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Concerns about close paraphrasing. Example: "noting the economic disparities between those who frequent the All Saints food pantry events and the residents of Ravenswood" "noted the economic disparities between those who frequent the All Saints soup kitchen and the residents of the surrounding neighborhood".
Nikkimaria (
talk) 13:24, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
I've changed this line to "...noting that individuals attending the All Saints food pantry events and the residents of Ravenswood were from economically disparate backgrounds."
I, Jethrobotdrop me a line (note: not a
bot!) 15:01, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PumpkinSkytalk 03:14, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
I Jethrobot (
talk). Self nom at 10:45, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
There is a problem with the hook. It only appears in the
WP:LEAD, which is suppose to be a summary of more detailed points made later in the main body. Nothing is suppose to appear in the LEAD that is not in the main body in greater detail.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 07:29, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Noted, and I have made appropriate changes in the body of the article.
I, Jethrobotdrop me a line (note: not a
bot!) 08:51, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
I think your references are lacking links for your reliable sources.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 01:19, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Um? I don't really know what you mean. What sources are problematic?
I, Jethrobotdrop me a line (note: not a
bot!) 03:59, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Sorry Tony, I am a little confused. The links for all the articles seem fine to me, and clicking on the article links brings you to the website of the periodical. Some of the articles are behind paywalls, but the full text of those articles is saved on the Church's website, which is why I put them there in addition to links to the paywall'd periodical website. There are also sources coming from the Church itself (e.g. information about its services), but this is not to establish notability. I'm not sure if either of these things address your concern, but otherwise, let me know in further detail about what I need to do.
I, Jethrobotdrop me a line (note: not a
bot!) 01:31, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Fix the links so that they don't redirect. I.e., use official names. Not The Chicago Tribune, just Chicago Tribune.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 22:08, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Concerns about close paraphrasing. Example: "noting the economic disparities between those who frequent the All Saints food pantry events and the residents of Ravenswood" "noted the economic disparities between those who frequent the All Saints soup kitchen and the residents of the surrounding neighborhood".
Nikkimaria (
talk) 13:24, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
I've changed this line to "...noting that individuals attending the All Saints food pantry events and the residents of Ravenswood were from economically disparate backgrounds."
I, Jethrobotdrop me a line (note: not a
bot!) 15:01, 5 December 2011 (UTC)