The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PumpkinSkytalk 16:05, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Article is new enough, long enough, properly cited, refs formatted, written well. AGF on offline refs. No review requirement because this is not a self-nom.
Marrante (
talk) 02:07, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PumpkinSkytalk 16:05, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Article is new enough, long enough, properly cited, refs formatted, written well. AGF on offline refs. No review requirement because this is not a self-nom.
Marrante (
talk) 02:07, 4 December 2011 (UTC)