The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PumpkinSkytalk 03:35, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Length, newness, in-line citation are fine. No controversial statements about living persons. The article appears to be well-referenced, and a couple spot-checks revealed no problems with mis-use of sources. Kiefer.
Wolfowitz 12:23, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PumpkinSkytalk 03:35, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Length, newness, in-line citation are fine. No controversial statements about living persons. The article appears to be well-referenced, and a couple spot-checks revealed no problems with mis-use of sources. Kiefer.
Wolfowitz 12:23, 7 November 2011 (UTC)