The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Created/expanded by
Kevmin (
talk). Self nom at 13:41, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
I am trying to verify the hook and am befuddled by the ref. Torada is not in
this ref. What am I looking for?--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 22:44, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Section Torada is covered on page's 22 and 27 and in detail on 68-70 where the section and species type descriptions are.--
Kevmin§ 17:55, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Oh. I was confused by the link. The actual source is offline. This is just s summary of the source as I understand it. Please remove the link. I went there looking for the fact.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 18:30, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Links to abstracts of biology/paleontology papers which are offline are preferred to not having any link.--
Kevmin§ 19:31, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Created/expanded by
Kevmin (
talk). Self nom at 13:41, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
I am trying to verify the hook and am befuddled by the ref. Torada is not in
this ref. What am I looking for?--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 22:44, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Section Torada is covered on page's 22 and 27 and in detail on 68-70 where the section and species type descriptions are.--
Kevmin§ 17:55, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Oh. I was confused by the link. The actual source is offline. This is just s summary of the source as I understand it. Please remove the link. I went there looking for the fact.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 18:30, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Links to abstracts of biology/paleontology papers which are offline are preferred to not having any link.--
Kevmin§ 19:31, 18 November 2011 (UTC)