The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 22:48, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Not yet long enough - needs some 200 chars. An important work. The image will not be useable - from Commons where it has a nonsense licence. It wouldn't have survived since 2013 except it was uncategorised.
Johnbod (
talk) 15:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Added content, should cover needed characters.
Hyperbolick (
talk) 15:21, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Nope - I make it 1489. This nom is beginning tio seem rather doom-laden.
Johnbod (
talk) 16:44, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
have a hunch we can find 11 more characters on historically important artwork.
Hyperbolick (
talk) 19:23, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
GTG without photo. Expansion ok, long enough (just), neutral & well-written. Photo not for main page. Both hooks check out, Earwig finds nothing.
Johnbod (
talk) 18:58, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Could
something like this be used? Key is that what is considered the "artwork" is the line itself, not the photo of it.
Hyperbolick (
talk) 19:13, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
I have commented out the image from this nomination page to avoid confusion when this is promoted to prep.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 18:57, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 22:48, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Not yet long enough - needs some 200 chars. An important work. The image will not be useable - from Commons where it has a nonsense licence. It wouldn't have survived since 2013 except it was uncategorised.
Johnbod (
talk) 15:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Added content, should cover needed characters.
Hyperbolick (
talk) 15:21, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Nope - I make it 1489. This nom is beginning tio seem rather doom-laden.
Johnbod (
talk) 16:44, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
have a hunch we can find 11 more characters on historically important artwork.
Hyperbolick (
talk) 19:23, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
GTG without photo. Expansion ok, long enough (just), neutral & well-written. Photo not for main page. Both hooks check out, Earwig finds nothing.
Johnbod (
talk) 18:58, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Could
something like this be used? Key is that what is considered the "artwork" is the line itself, not the photo of it.
Hyperbolick (
talk) 19:13, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
I have commented out the image from this nomination page to avoid confusion when this is promoted to prep.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 18:57, 3 January 2020 (UTC)