The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (18.0% confidence;
confirm)
Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 40.8% confidence. (
confirm)
Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 23.7% confidence. (
confirm)
Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
General comments
• Some overall issues detected
✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length for 3 nominations at 119 characters (17 after subtracting extra links)
✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length for 3 nominations at 171 characters (69 after subtracting extra links)
✗Epicgenius has more than 5 DYK credits. 3 QPQ reviews are required for this nomination.
: The hook is sourced and the articles are long enough.pbp 22:43, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
A full review is still needed: the articles must be reviewed against all of the DYK criteria, including neutrality and close paraphrasing/copyvio (independently of the GA review), and since all three QPQ reviews have not yet been completed, the tick should not have been used.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 15:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
@
BlueMoonset: You want me to assess those two criteria? OK.
Neutrality: The hook and the alternate hook are, IMO, neutrally worded.
Copyvio/Paraphrasing: "The first major expansion" is a direct quote from citation 55 on 72nd Street. The rest of the information is a paraphase of citations 54 and 55. 86th Street uses the same language and the same citations. pbp 01:29, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (18.0% confidence;
confirm)
Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 40.8% confidence. (
confirm)
Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 23.7% confidence. (
confirm)
Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
General comments
• Some overall issues detected
✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length for 3 nominations at 119 characters (17 after subtracting extra links)
✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length for 3 nominations at 171 characters (69 after subtracting extra links)
✗Epicgenius has more than 5 DYK credits. 3 QPQ reviews are required for this nomination.
: The hook is sourced and the articles are long enough.pbp 22:43, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
A full review is still needed: the articles must be reviewed against all of the DYK criteria, including neutrality and close paraphrasing/copyvio (independently of the GA review), and since all three QPQ reviews have not yet been completed, the tick should not have been used.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 15:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
@
BlueMoonset: You want me to assess those two criteria? OK.
Neutrality: The hook and the alternate hook are, IMO, neutrally worded.
Copyvio/Paraphrasing: "The first major expansion" is a direct quote from citation 55 on 72nd Street. The rest of the information is a paraphase of citations 54 and 55. 86th Street uses the same language and the same citations. pbp 01:29, 18 November 2016 (UTC)