The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 02:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
5x expanded by Michael D. Turnbull ( talk). Self-nominated at 12:17, 11 February 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
More than fivefold expanded from
this ~300-character version that existed on 7 February to
this >3000-character version from 11 February. All sources are, as far as I can tell, reliable.
Earwig reveals no copyvio. Spotchecking sources reveals no obvious issues. The article doesn't appear to have any disqualifying issues, though I can't entirely rule out having missed something on account of this all being rather technical. At any rate, I'm willing to
WP:AGF. A better hook and this is good to go.
TompaDompa (
talk) 19:58, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Shorter hook suggestion taking account of TompaDompa's comment, at the expense of having more acronyms. I wanted to refer to "radical SAM" as, apart from being interesting to a scientists that such things exist, this is hooky as it looks like a political statement about a person Sam. Other variants welcome. Mike Turnbull ( talk) 10:18, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
... that RNA, DNA, and vitamins B1 and B12 are all made from AIR?I would personally be significantly more likely to click on a hook like that. TompaDompa ( talk) 18:57, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
OK, that's a perfectly good suggestion, thanks. Mike Turnbull ( talk) 08:28, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 02:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
5x expanded by Michael D. Turnbull ( talk). Self-nominated at 12:17, 11 February 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
More than fivefold expanded from
this ~300-character version that existed on 7 February to
this >3000-character version from 11 February. All sources are, as far as I can tell, reliable.
Earwig reveals no copyvio. Spotchecking sources reveals no obvious issues. The article doesn't appear to have any disqualifying issues, though I can't entirely rule out having missed something on account of this all being rather technical. At any rate, I'm willing to
WP:AGF. A better hook and this is good to go.
TompaDompa (
talk) 19:58, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Shorter hook suggestion taking account of TompaDompa's comment, at the expense of having more acronyms. I wanted to refer to "radical SAM" as, apart from being interesting to a scientists that such things exist, this is hooky as it looks like a political statement about a person Sam. Other variants welcome. Mike Turnbull ( talk) 10:18, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
... that RNA, DNA, and vitamins B1 and B12 are all made from AIR?I would personally be significantly more likely to click on a hook like that. TompaDompa ( talk) 18:57, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
OK, that's a perfectly good suggestion, thanks. Mike Turnbull ( talk) 08:28, 19 February 2022 (UTC)