The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 13:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment: On January 9, (the last edit before January 19), this page was
511 B. DYKcheck doesn't approve this as 5x, but it's 2580 B (5.05x) as of my nomination.
It's current 3,205 bytes; also, I added the Russian reaction.
George Ho (
talk) 01:30, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
-- Looks good. As of nomination on January 21, article had been 5x expanded in preceding five days, the hook is cited to Time magazine, so I think we are good there. QPQ is in good shape. I think we are done here. GoPhightins! 02:54, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
OK, based on that, I do not find anything egregious either ... most of the duplicates are quotes ... looks like that first site copied us, not vice versa. I still think we are good to go here. / GoPhightins! 20:20, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 13:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment: On January 9, (the last edit before January 19), this page was
511 B. DYKcheck doesn't approve this as 5x, but it's 2580 B (5.05x) as of my nomination.
It's current 3,205 bytes; also, I added the Russian reaction.
George Ho (
talk) 01:30, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
-- Looks good. As of nomination on January 21, article had been 5x expanded in preceding five days, the hook is cited to Time magazine, so I think we are good there. QPQ is in good shape. I think we are done here. GoPhightins! 02:54, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
OK, based on that, I do not find anything egregious either ... most of the duplicates are quotes ... looks like that first site copied us, not vice versa. I still think we are good to go here. / GoPhightins! 20:20, 20 February 2015 (UTC)