The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 13:50, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
New enough (27 Jan) and long enough (~4.3k chars). Sourced, neutral with no apparent copyvio. Hook is stated and cited to
this BBC match commentary (or
this more stable report). QPQ done. Good for the 1st March, preferably before kick off (16:00 UTC). One question though, I've used the first revision by
Arbero to calculate the fivefold expansion (it doesn't qualify otherwise). Is there a reason why they are left out of the credits? I get that the majority of the text was written by
The Almightey Drill in late December and uncommented a month later but, going through the history, I think they have done as much to the article as the nominator to warrant equal credit.
Fuebaey (
talk) 01:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment: I would like
User:Arbero credited for this, he has made a significant amount of editing to it
'''tAD''' (
talk) 20:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 13:50, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
New enough (27 Jan) and long enough (~4.3k chars). Sourced, neutral with no apparent copyvio. Hook is stated and cited to
this BBC match commentary (or
this more stable report). QPQ done. Good for the 1st March, preferably before kick off (16:00 UTC). One question though, I've used the first revision by
Arbero to calculate the fivefold expansion (it doesn't qualify otherwise). Is there a reason why they are left out of the credits? I get that the majority of the text was written by
The Almightey Drill in late December and uncommented a month later but, going through the history, I think they have done as much to the article as the nominator to warrant equal credit.
Fuebaey (
talk) 01:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment: I would like
User:Arbero credited for this, he has made a significant amount of editing to it
'''tAD''' (
talk) 20:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)