The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Created by
RobLa (
talk) and
Jon698 (
talk). Self-nominated at 02:24, 20 May 2022 (UTC).
: The article is new enough (created on May 18, 2022). I see that you are a major contributor, but not the page creater. I think the page creator (
RobLa) deserves DYK credit. The article is long enough (5868 characters). Well written and well cited. The hook in interesting and meets other guidelines. However, it has lot of links. Ideally, the article should be only think to be linked (in addition to any technical terms). I think we can remove the link to Burlington and Burke from the hook. Upto you, though. A QPQ has been done and not used elsewhere. The hooks in in the article, with a citation. Almost good to go. –
Kavyansh.Singh (
talk) 10:40, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Created by
RobLa (
talk) and
Jon698 (
talk). Self-nominated at 02:24, 20 May 2022 (UTC).
: The article is new enough (created on May 18, 2022). I see that you are a major contributor, but not the page creater. I think the page creator (
RobLa) deserves DYK credit. The article is long enough (5868 characters). Well written and well cited. The hook in interesting and meets other guidelines. However, it has lot of links. Ideally, the article should be only think to be linked (in addition to any technical terms). I think we can remove the link to Burlington and Burke from the hook. Upto you, though. A QPQ has been done and not used elsewhere. The hooks in in the article, with a citation. Almost good to go. –
Kavyansh.Singh (
talk) 10:40, 20 May 2022 (UTC)