The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 09:56, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
ALT1: ... that until a 1993 reform separate gallantry medals were awarded to officers and other ranks in the British armed forces? "Yesterday, Malcolm Rifkind, Secretary of State for Defence, announced the new system. It preserves the four-tier structure of the old system, but abolishes different awards for officers and other ranks." from:
"Medals to be open to all: Review fulfils Prime Minister's aim of 'rankless' awards". The Independent. 18 October 1993. Retrieved 25 October 2021.
ALT2: ... that in 1993 British prime minister
John Majorabolished the automatic award of British honours to people holding specified posts, except for
High Court judges who would continue to be appointed knights and dames?"John Major also placed more emphasis on rewarding voluntary service and encouraging public nominations, and announced that there should be no assumption that honours would automatically be attached to particular posts in either the public or the private sector – with one exception, which was that judges should still be knighted. His decisions affected the British Empire by ending the automatic GBE for the lord mayor of London, but continuing the DBE for female justices." from: Malloch, Russell.
"The Order of the British Empire (part five): 1993 to 2017". London Gazette. Retrieved 9 July 2021.
Moved to mainspace by
Dumelow (
talk). Self-nominated at 07:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, not stub, well written. QPQ provided. Image free and clear and goes with proposed hook. All hooks are in the article and each is followed by an inline citation to a reference containing the hook fact. ALT2 is a bit too long. Random check of references done. This is a good resource you have produced. I prefer the proposed hook with image. Thank you.
Whispyhistory (
talk) 16:23, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 09:56, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
ALT1: ... that until a 1993 reform separate gallantry medals were awarded to officers and other ranks in the British armed forces? "Yesterday, Malcolm Rifkind, Secretary of State for Defence, announced the new system. It preserves the four-tier structure of the old system, but abolishes different awards for officers and other ranks." from:
"Medals to be open to all: Review fulfils Prime Minister's aim of 'rankless' awards". The Independent. 18 October 1993. Retrieved 25 October 2021.
ALT2: ... that in 1993 British prime minister
John Majorabolished the automatic award of British honours to people holding specified posts, except for
High Court judges who would continue to be appointed knights and dames?"John Major also placed more emphasis on rewarding voluntary service and encouraging public nominations, and announced that there should be no assumption that honours would automatically be attached to particular posts in either the public or the private sector – with one exception, which was that judges should still be knighted. His decisions affected the British Empire by ending the automatic GBE for the lord mayor of London, but continuing the DBE for female justices." from: Malloch, Russell.
"The Order of the British Empire (part five): 1993 to 2017". London Gazette. Retrieved 9 July 2021.
Moved to mainspace by
Dumelow (
talk). Self-nominated at 07:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, not stub, well written. QPQ provided. Image free and clear and goes with proposed hook. All hooks are in the article and each is followed by an inline citation to a reference containing the hook fact. ALT2 is a bit too long. Random check of references done. This is a good resource you have produced. I prefer the proposed hook with image. Thank you.
Whispyhistory (
talk) 16:23, 15 November 2021 (UTC)