The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:36, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Article is big enough, new enough (6 days pre-nom) and correct person credited. No copyright infringement according to the detector. Neutrally written. On the topic of the hook, it is short enough, but does not appear to be correct. The riot happened in 1990, and the destruction in 1992, so that would not be in the wake. Also although the claimed source uses the word "serious" I do not see it termed "destructive". So I am looking to see a new hook. This appears to be the 5th DYK nomination by by
Winged Blades of Godric, so no QPQ is required. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Graeme Bartlett (
talk •
contribs)
@
Graeme Bartlett: - Serious over here, obviously alludes to the destructive nature. Apologies about the other point.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:36, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Article is big enough, new enough (6 days pre-nom) and correct person credited. No copyright infringement according to the detector. Neutrally written. On the topic of the hook, it is short enough, but does not appear to be correct. The riot happened in 1990, and the destruction in 1992, so that would not be in the wake. Also although the claimed source uses the word "serious" I do not see it termed "destructive". So I am looking to see a new hook. This appears to be the 5th DYK nomination by by
Winged Blades of Godric, so no QPQ is required. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Graeme Bartlett (
talk •
contribs)
@
Graeme Bartlett: - Serious over here, obviously alludes to the destructive nature. Apologies about the other point.