The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 14:18, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Clear at 100px: - ? Somewhat difficult to see. Definitely a carving but what is it?
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Passes DYK checklist.
Review Good to go! 5X Expansion. Went from 140 characters to 2208. Timely nominated. Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited. In passing, I note that I do not speak or read Norwegian, so as to those sources I
WP:AGF I did not have access to the offline sources.
Earwig's copy violation detector: Åmøy report gives it a clean bill. Hook is hooky enough, I think, and relates directly to the essence of the article. It is interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. I found and added an English language on line source that directly supports the hook. QPQ done, although article is not yet promoted (not required). 7&6=thirteen (
☎) 00:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 14:18, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Clear at 100px: - ? Somewhat difficult to see. Definitely a carving but what is it?
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Passes DYK checklist.
Review Good to go! 5X Expansion. Went from 140 characters to 2208. Timely nominated. Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited. In passing, I note that I do not speak or read Norwegian, so as to those sources I
WP:AGF I did not have access to the offline sources.
Earwig's copy violation detector: Åmøy report gives it a clean bill. Hook is hooky enough, I think, and relates directly to the essence of the article. It is interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. I found and added an English language on line source that directly supports the hook. QPQ done, although article is not yet promoted (not required). 7&6=thirteen (
☎) 00:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)