From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleYorktown campaign has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 28, 2011 Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Yorktown campaign/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 23:54, 22 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria reply

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    One minor tag to be resolved
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Link de Grasse in the lead.
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Can you add a map of the Yorktown area, preferably one that shows the location of the Battle of the Capes?
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Nice work.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 16:25, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks! I think I've addressed your issues. Magic ♪piano 17:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Agreed.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 18:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleYorktown campaign has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 28, 2011 Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Yorktown campaign/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 23:54, 22 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria reply

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    One minor tag to be resolved
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Link de Grasse in the lead.
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Can you add a map of the Yorktown area, preferably one that shows the location of the Battle of the Capes?
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Nice work.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 16:25, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks! I think I've addressed your issues. Magic ♪piano 17:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Agreed.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 18:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook