When Megan Went Away is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
When Megan Went Away is part of the Jane Severance series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 26, 2023. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2021 and 17 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CadeCaggiano.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 04:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I am planning on making some changes to the the article in the coming weeks. I am aware that the article is pretty well developed, hence the good article rating it received. However, I do believe there is work to be done to improve it even further. For one, I am aiming to clean up the introduction section, considering there are no citations referenced in the current version. Secondly, and arguably the most notable change I will make to the article is the reorganization of the structure, which I believe will better align with the Wikipedia standard. For example, I will make sure that the article includes these sections in this order: Intro, Background, Plot, Genre, Publication, Reception, Analysis, Awards. I will not discard a majority of the information already written in the article, I will just reassign it to fit under the sections mentioned. I believe that by doing so, the information will be better organized and easier for readers to navigate. In addition to structural changes, I might make a few sentence revisions or grammatical corrections where I see fit. Lastly, one of my main goals is to try to make the reception piece as neutral as possible, representing both positive and negative sides of the spectrum. I believe that currently it is a little one sided, representing the negative takes on the book. If I can find enough quality sources to balance this out, I will be very pleased. Again, I won't be making any huge content changes but I feel that these structural changes and small revisions will go a long way in improving the article's quality. Here is the list of sources I will be using to make these changes: [ Megan Went Away Bibliography] /> CadeCaggiano ( talk) 13:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Bobamnertiopsis, thanks for all the feedback you provided. I really appreciate your guidance and knowledge as I look to work through this process.
Hi CadeCaggiano. Thanks for your notes! The only note of caution I have now is that I'm not sure a "Recent Developments" section necessarily makes sense for a page like this if the information it would contain isn't directly pertinent to WMWA. I'm actually surprised realizing just now that we have no article about queer characters in picturebooks (the closest would have to be this section in the Gay literature article) but a "Recent developments" section would be much better suited for an article covering the whole topic of queer kids' literature, rather than any article on an individual book. Looking forward to seeing what you do with this page! — Collin t c 21:28, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Bobamnertiopsis. I would like to inform you that I have finished making my draft for potential edits/additions to be made for the article. I used the sources you used plus a few others to make educated additions that I hope you will like. A linked version of my draft is here: [2]. As you will read in the preface, I summarize my edits and explain how my personal additions are found in bold text. Feel free to read and reply back to me with any feedback, suggestions, or general comments in the talk page. After we agree on finalizing the edits, I will publish them live to the actual page (hopefully by this Sunday, Dec 8). Thanks, CadeCaggiano ( talk) 00:13, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The lede states "copies are primarily accessible in archives and library special collections as of the 2010s." Should this be changed to past tense? ☆ Bri ( talk) 21:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Several guest users are vandalizing the article every minute. I think the article should be locked to prevent further vandalism. Harrier Du Bois ( talk) 03:19, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
When Megan Went Away is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
When Megan Went Away is part of the Jane Severance series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 26, 2023. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2021 and 17 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CadeCaggiano.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 04:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I am planning on making some changes to the the article in the coming weeks. I am aware that the article is pretty well developed, hence the good article rating it received. However, I do believe there is work to be done to improve it even further. For one, I am aiming to clean up the introduction section, considering there are no citations referenced in the current version. Secondly, and arguably the most notable change I will make to the article is the reorganization of the structure, which I believe will better align with the Wikipedia standard. For example, I will make sure that the article includes these sections in this order: Intro, Background, Plot, Genre, Publication, Reception, Analysis, Awards. I will not discard a majority of the information already written in the article, I will just reassign it to fit under the sections mentioned. I believe that by doing so, the information will be better organized and easier for readers to navigate. In addition to structural changes, I might make a few sentence revisions or grammatical corrections where I see fit. Lastly, one of my main goals is to try to make the reception piece as neutral as possible, representing both positive and negative sides of the spectrum. I believe that currently it is a little one sided, representing the negative takes on the book. If I can find enough quality sources to balance this out, I will be very pleased. Again, I won't be making any huge content changes but I feel that these structural changes and small revisions will go a long way in improving the article's quality. Here is the list of sources I will be using to make these changes: [ Megan Went Away Bibliography] /> CadeCaggiano ( talk) 13:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Bobamnertiopsis, thanks for all the feedback you provided. I really appreciate your guidance and knowledge as I look to work through this process.
Hi CadeCaggiano. Thanks for your notes! The only note of caution I have now is that I'm not sure a "Recent Developments" section necessarily makes sense for a page like this if the information it would contain isn't directly pertinent to WMWA. I'm actually surprised realizing just now that we have no article about queer characters in picturebooks (the closest would have to be this section in the Gay literature article) but a "Recent developments" section would be much better suited for an article covering the whole topic of queer kids' literature, rather than any article on an individual book. Looking forward to seeing what you do with this page! — Collin t c 21:28, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Bobamnertiopsis. I would like to inform you that I have finished making my draft for potential edits/additions to be made for the article. I used the sources you used plus a few others to make educated additions that I hope you will like. A linked version of my draft is here: [2]. As you will read in the preface, I summarize my edits and explain how my personal additions are found in bold text. Feel free to read and reply back to me with any feedback, suggestions, or general comments in the talk page. After we agree on finalizing the edits, I will publish them live to the actual page (hopefully by this Sunday, Dec 8). Thanks, CadeCaggiano ( talk) 00:13, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The lede states "copies are primarily accessible in archives and library special collections as of the 2010s." Should this be changed to past tense? ☆ Bri ( talk) 21:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Several guest users are vandalizing the article every minute. I think the article should be locked to prevent further vandalism. Harrier Du Bois ( talk) 03:19, 26 April 2023 (UTC)