This article is written in American English, and some terms used in it are different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. AmericanLemming ( talk) 17:26, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Villa Regina was nominated as a Geography and places good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 10, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague ( talk · contribs) 21:14, 7 July 2013 (UTC) Review coming soon... QatarStarsLeague ( talk) 21:14, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
I grappled this decision for a while, but I have come to the conclusion that this article does not meet GA criteria, and is too distant from the standard to be placed on hold. The main issue is prose, the text reads with viscosity, as there are numerous sentence fragments, incongruent phrases, and improperly-denoted quotes. Also there is much topical parlance, for example you mention Colonel Manuel José Olascoaga without mentioning in what capacity he wrote of Villa Regina. Another issue is copyrights. Many images are of free usage in Argentina, but no specificity as to whether the image is in the public domain in other nations. There are a few unsourced statements in the article as well. I can tell you are very passionate about this subject, and so failing this article is just as disappointing for me as it is for you. I have included a GA criterion table to serve as a lodestar for improvement. I anticipate a second nomination after these issues are allayed. QatarStarsLeague ( talk) 02:00, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
This article recently had an unsuccessful GAN. As the copy-editor of the article, I did not manage to finish addressing the reviewer's main concern, which was with the article's prose, until yesterday, when I finished the copy-edit. However, there are some specific issues I noticed as I copy-edited the article, and I believe that listing them here in detail would go a long way toward helping the nominator bring the article up to GA status.
Lead: nothing here
History: as by the far longest section of the article, most of the issues I found were in this section
Geography:
Economy:
Education:
Again, these are merely suggestions for improving the article. Not fixing them doesn't necessarily mean that the article is doomed to fail its second GAN, and fixing them doesn't guarantee that it will pass. I've never reviewed a GAN myself, so I really can't say whether any given article should pass or not.
That being said, I will watch both the article and the talk page to assist the nominator in fixing these issues/making other improvements to the article. AmericanLemming ( talk) 17:16, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Villa Regina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
This article is written in American English, and some terms used in it are different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. AmericanLemming ( talk) 17:26, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Villa Regina was nominated as a Geography and places good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 10, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague ( talk · contribs) 21:14, 7 July 2013 (UTC) Review coming soon... QatarStarsLeague ( talk) 21:14, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
I grappled this decision for a while, but I have come to the conclusion that this article does not meet GA criteria, and is too distant from the standard to be placed on hold. The main issue is prose, the text reads with viscosity, as there are numerous sentence fragments, incongruent phrases, and improperly-denoted quotes. Also there is much topical parlance, for example you mention Colonel Manuel José Olascoaga without mentioning in what capacity he wrote of Villa Regina. Another issue is copyrights. Many images are of free usage in Argentina, but no specificity as to whether the image is in the public domain in other nations. There are a few unsourced statements in the article as well. I can tell you are very passionate about this subject, and so failing this article is just as disappointing for me as it is for you. I have included a GA criterion table to serve as a lodestar for improvement. I anticipate a second nomination after these issues are allayed. QatarStarsLeague ( talk) 02:00, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
This article recently had an unsuccessful GAN. As the copy-editor of the article, I did not manage to finish addressing the reviewer's main concern, which was with the article's prose, until yesterday, when I finished the copy-edit. However, there are some specific issues I noticed as I copy-edited the article, and I believe that listing them here in detail would go a long way toward helping the nominator bring the article up to GA status.
Lead: nothing here
History: as by the far longest section of the article, most of the issues I found were in this section
Geography:
Economy:
Education:
Again, these are merely suggestions for improving the article. Not fixing them doesn't necessarily mean that the article is doomed to fail its second GAN, and fixing them doesn't guarantee that it will pass. I've never reviewed a GAN myself, so I really can't say whether any given article should pass or not.
That being said, I will watch both the article and the talk page to assist the nominator in fixing these issues/making other improvements to the article. AmericanLemming ( talk) 17:16, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Villa Regina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)