This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: National / North America / United States / American Civil War / World War I This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  National militaries task force North American military history task force United States military history task force American Civil War task force World War I task force

Someone seriously flagged this for questionable notability? This is a 220 year old militia that still exists. That's pretty notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wronghead ( talk • contribs) 15:44, 6 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I've deleted one photo entitled 'Engaging targets', which appears to be of a soldier in front of a vehicle in Iraq or Afghanistan - there is no obvious connection to an article about the Veteran Corps of Artillery of the State of New York. This is merely the most blatant of a number of pictures on individuals that are of limited relevance to the subject and appear to be mostly present as a type of self promotion - see the policy note WP:PROMOTION. Blackshod ( talk) 14:00, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Veteran Corps of Artillery of the State of New York. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive {newarchive} to http://9thregiment.com/page/4/?s=%E3
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110210030818/http://strategypage.com/military_history_jul.asp to http://www.strategypage.com/military_history_jul.asp
• Added archive {newarchive} to http://9thregiment.com/page/4/?s=%E3
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110210030818/http://strategypage.com/military_history_jul.asp to http://www.strategypage.com/military_history_jul.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC) reply