This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
@ 79.65.101.219: Please explain why you are removing sourced information repeatedly. Your edit summary applies to only a tiny fraction of what you are removing, and is therefore unacceptable. ··· 日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:54, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 ( talk) 10:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Hikaru Utada →
Utada Hikaru – Per
MOS:IDENTITY and
MOS:JA, and consistent use in academic and other high-quality sources. Detailed rationale and source pile given in separate post below, so the
WP:RM page isn't clogged with a huge entry. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 07:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
The previous RM in 2008, which moved this article away from the earlier Utada Hikaru title, was based (albeit in good faith) on essentially nothing but the then-current wording of MOS:JA, which at that time strongly favored Western name order regardless of other considerations. I think the above MOS:IDENTITY and WP:ABOUTSELF argument is actually entirely sufficient for a move. However, a notable amount of debate was had about MOS:JA's wording throughout 2015 and perhaps earlier (I wasn't tracking it the whole time) and Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Japan-related articles#Personal names now provides a checklist of points to consider.
The #1 point on that list is: "Use the form personally or professionally used by the person, if available in the English/Latin alphabet (this can include the spelling appearing on their official website or official social media profile, but do not rely on a URL when the actual text is all Japanese)"
, and the evidence presented above perfectly complies with this. The previous RM noted a 7:1 Google hits ratio in favor of "Utada Hikaru" over "Hikaru Utada". A more carefully constructed search today still results in a 4.8:1 preference for "Utada Hikaru"
[5],
[6]. While
[7]. While the original RM showed a slight favoritism toward "Hikaru Utada" in a Google News search, Western news sources are notoriously bad for this kind of question, as they routinely force Western name order for lowest-common-denominator expediency reasons (this is also why we don't use stats about them in various other human-name-rendering RMs, such as those dealing with diacritics). Nevertheless, some use U.H. name order, including
Time magazine, despite that publication's American conservatism
[8], and them same could be said of New Statesman
[9]; however, plenty of news sources use H.U. order.
The next MOS:JA naming criterion: #2, appearance in other encyclopedias: "Utada Hikaru" is used in Continuum Encyclopedia of Popular Music of the World [10] which is professionally edited, but the opposite result was found in Encyclopedia.com [11], which seems to be pro-edited (and which has information we are missing, including on Utada's early bi-national life, BTW). I did also find "Hikaru Utada" in World Heritage Encyclopedia [12], but this is a false hit because its content is derived in part directly from our own (and it's very obvious in their article on this subject, which even has the same headings from an earlier version of our article). The Guinness Book of World Records uses U.H. order (she has a WR? why doesn't our article say so?) [13] [note: if the content is not visible at that link, it is here, 2nd entry: [14]], and in another of their publications [15] (if not visible, see top entry here: [16]]. Another tertiary source, The Children's Book of Music, gives the U.H. name order [17]. The Encyclopedia of World Pop Music, 1980-2001 gives all names in the form "Utada, Hikaru", so is of no help [18]; same goes for Contemporary Musicians: Profiles of the People in Music [19]. The "Hikaru UTADA" or "UTADA Hikaru" formats [20] are also of little relevance to WP. Other search results looking for such topical encyclopedia entries just turn up blogs and wikis and such [21].
Back to MOS:JA, #3 & #4 "Use the form publicly used on behalf of the person in the English-speaking world ... [or] in any other popular Latin-alphabet-using language"
: Utada's record/video labels consistently publish her material as "Utada Hikaru" or "Utada", never "Hikaru Utada"; there seems to be no other relevant party to consult, since no one else is using her name on her behalf. The 5th point only applies to diacritics.
The cited MOS:JA section also says: "Follow the usage of academic texts or a widely used reference such as a published encyclopedia in matters of spelling, macron usage, and name order. Such sources generally give Japanese names family name first."
There are few academic-journal sources with which to work. The industry (not academic) journal Perfect Beat has U.H. name order
[22], as does the German-language academic journal Digitale Jugendkulturen ('Digital Youth-culture')
[23], the Journal of the Society for Asian Music
[24], and the Journal of Japanese Trade & Industry
[25]. Same U.H. results in similar Japan-oriented trade journals, including Japan Spotlight
[26], Look Japan
[27], and many others; but this was not entirely consistent (I found three exceptions in this class of trade publication:
[28],
[29],
[30]). Academic books favor U.H. order, such as the media-studies volume Popular Culture Co-Productions and Collaborations in East and Southeast Asia
[31], Globalization and Popular Music in South Korea
[32], and Japan After Japan: Social and Cultural Life from the Recessionary 1990s to the Present
[33] (I can't find any that use H.U. order). Not sure Managing Media Companies counts as academic, except in an MBA sense, but it, too, has U.H. order, in a list with "Janet Jackson", etc.
[34] Non-academic English-language materials on Japanese pop culture naturally lean toward native Japanese name ordering, like Anime Reign
[35], etc., but this is not universal, as shown by Giant Robot
[36]. The above seems to be about the best we can do for a recent pop-culture figure.
Google N-grams and Books: An N-grams search produces results for "Utada Hikaru" but zero for "Hikaru Utada" (in a corpus that only has data up to 2008, and which I constrained to 1997 at the lower bound, to weed out any historical people with this name)
[37]. A Google "Books" search is useless statistically (though was how many of the cited sources were found, using a search string of "Utada Hikaru" OR "Hikaru Utada" -wikipedia
[38]); the majority of the results are Billboard Magazine (i.e., low-quality [added: namely,
tertiary and with
close fiduciary ties to the music industry] news material, not books) which seems to have a policy of forcibly westernizing names; self-published crap ("e-study guides", "mini-bios", etc.) that has to be ignored; and sheet music (which naturally follows the labels in using "Utada Hikaru"). Not all of the entertainment press is as jingoistic as Billboard:
[39],
[40]. Two pieces of professionally-published fiction that turned up (one in French) give U.H. name order when mentioning her in an in-context way
[41],
[42]. I stopped trawling these entries after about 10 or 12 screenfuls of results. The majority of the sources using H.U. order were either unreliable, or were newssources, and we already have GNews stats showing that they tend to favor that order, so I need not link them all here; I did include notable cases of "anti-U.H." results in the data above.
Overall, I think the case for a move back to Utada Hikaru is overwhelming, both on the basis of current WP:POLICY and per a preponderance of reliable, high-quality, non-news sources.
PS: Note that various of these sources can be WP:MINEd for additional information to use in this article, beyond the two I already highlighted for this purpose. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 07:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC) Updated with additional rationale. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 09:55, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Follow the usage of academic texts or a widely used reference such as a published encyclopedia in matters of spelling, macron usage, and name order. Such sources generally give Japanese names family name firstand
Use the form publicly used on behalf of the person in the English-speaking world ... [or] in any other popular Latin-alphabet-using languageto be most convincing here. I, JethroBT drop me a line 08:31, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Utada Hikaru. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Can someone please find a better (current) picture of Utada for use on the article? The last one(s) used are almost, if not more, than 10 years old. I'd do it myself, but I'd fear the wrath of not getting an appropriate, loyalty-free image. ( Jeimii ( talk) 21:02, 21 August 2016 (UTC))
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Utada Hikaru. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:58, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Im not sure make a decision Freackk ( talk) 22:19, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 11 external links on Utada Hikaru. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:18, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Utada Hikaru. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:43, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
There's all kinds of "an announcement was made that [something in the future]" stuff in this article about stuff that was in the future in, say, 2010, but which is now way in the past. This material needs to be rewritten to say what did happen rather than what was once planned to happen, or it's simply unencyclopedic "old news". — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 15:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
I like Utada, but I find this article to be hell to read because of the choppy prose and one section (2010–15) being overly long. The article doesn't even elaborate further on her musical styles, such as the types of sounds her albums convey or her lyrical topics. There's also no awards section whatsoever, and I can imagine with how big she is in Japan that'd she be nominated for several awards. (if hadn't not won any) Let's not forget the missing references in some sections either. Because of these reasons, I think that this article should be reduced to a C-class. 100cellsman ( talk) 05:40, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
This article needs a review to standardize referencing the performer by last/family name as the subject of sentences throughout.
Ref:
Katy Perry and
Kevin Hart are referenced by last name ("Perry did this"; "Hart did that") in standard encyclopedia/journalistic style.
Currently the article switches back and forth between her fist and last name. It should be "Utada" throughout.--
GimmeChoco44 (
talk) 09:11, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Typically, although Eastern name order is preferred by Japanese people when Romanizing their names, there isn't a general consensus on which name order to use in WP:JTITLE – hence, we have the article at Shinzo Abe, not Abe Shinzo. One could compare this to Qazaqstan vs. Kazakhstan or Chornobyl vs Chernobyl, where the natural transliteration isn't the one in common English usage. If the Western name order for Utada – or, indeed, the Eastern name order for other figures – garners greater usage, the matter can be revisited. However, in the case of Utada, the links provided by TJRC indicate her releases tend to be attributed to "Utada" or "Utada Hikaru". ( closed by non-admin page mover) Sceptre ( talk) 20:29, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Utada Hikaru →
Hikaru Utada – Her english name have to be "Hikaru Utada" as well as other japanese english names, like "
Shinzo Abe," "
Seiji Ozawa," "
Takeshi Kaneshiro," "
Kohei Uchida," "
Ayumu Hirano," "
Shizuka Arakawa," "
Satomi Ishihara, "
Yoko Ono." Moreover, up to now, her official website in english language has been calling her "Hikaru Utada." See
Hikaru Utada Official Website NEWS and
amazon.com. Her japanese name is "宇多田ヒカル," therefore, "Utada Hikaru" is just her japanese name's romanization. This means that "Utada Hikaru" cannot be her english name, even if some people have mistaken so. And then, I cannot help but think that nobody can discuss this critical mistake constructively, because this rule about japanese people's english name is already traditional rule and self-evident truth. Nobody, except nuts, can insist "Utada" is her first name. Nobody, except nuts, can insist her first name "Hikaru" should be placed at the position of english last name "Utada," ignoring english name's traditional rule and her will.
Beaver4100 (
talk) 22:30, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
I recently copied the defaultsort from here and added it to Template:Utada Hikaru songs to keep them consistent, but my edit was reverted. I found that the defaultsort here was changed on April 23, 2019, [45], and it currently sorts in categories by Hikaru, while the template, Template:Utada Hikaru, Utada Hikaru discography, List of songs recorded by Utada Hikaru and List of awards received by Utada Hikaru. I wanted to make sure which sorting was correct and make the articles and template consistent in their use. Aspects ( talk) 05:28, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
I couldn't figure out how I should word this to cover both problems, but I placed the tag where it was because ... well, this strikes me as similar to this: I've been trying, in the above discussion, to avoid all pronouns pending a "consensus" on how we should refer to our subject, and so I've been overusing our subject's surname, but I don't think it's not a "mononym" any more than "Biden". Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 02:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Considering the
Wikipedia guidelines for associated acts contained in the infobox:
1. Should
Teruzane Utada be removed? (cite: "producers, managers, etc." are in the "to be avoided" category)
2. Should
Shiina Ringo be added since she and Utada have more than one single together?
3. Are there any other artists who would qualify under these guidelines?
--
GimmeChoco44 (
talk) 18:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Has Utada announced which pronouns are correct? Given the Instagram post complaining about "Miss/Mrs/Ms" being used, it might be they/them? 2A02:8109:A33F:F27C:150A:8BDE:B6C2:17CC ( talk) 17:20, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
{{
pronoun}}
on other Wikipedia users to find their prefs, although updating preferences to newer pronouns has yet to be done.
AngusW🐶🐶F (
bark •
sniff) 23:32, 6 August 2021 (UTC)An IP editor today reinstated the plural they/them pronouns, but this time with a source. [1] Assuming todayonline.com is a WP:RS (I'm not familiar with it, so cannot opine either way), I think that's sufficient to support the change. TJRC ( talk) 03:17, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
References
Utada, who now uses the pronouns they/them...
Until Hikaru states explicitly that she wants a specific pronoun, standard English rules apply to this article. The quote attributed to her is not a definitive statement, and a commentary on marital status more than sexuality -- GimmeChoco44 ( talk) 22:05, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
standard English, what pronouns does one use when they do not know what a person's pronoun preference is (or doesn't known the gender of a person at all)? They/them. So the correct choice, per policy, is pretty dang obvious. Newimpartial ( talk) 22:29, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
factual referencefor a pronoun choice before changing the pronouns. Since we do not know for sure the subject's preference, we use
standard Englishthey/them far he than
past usagegendered pronouns - the past usage simply no longer applies after a gender identity announcement. Newimpartial ( talk) 22:40, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
explicitly declared pronouns? We have a reliable source reporting a gender identity declaration as nonbinary; that is enough to require us to strip out all gendered pronouns for now. Newimpartial ( talk) 23:31, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Newimpartial ( talk) 01:12, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Refer to any person whose gender might be questioned with gendered words (e.g. pronouns, "man/woman", "waiter/waitress") that reflect the person's latest expressed gender self-identification as reported in the most recent reliable sources, even if it does not match what is most common in sources.. By this logic, pronouns should be she/her until Utada directly addresses her pronouns, not just her gender. Unnamed anon ( talk) 23:14, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
last expressed gender self-identificationis non-binary, not female. While some non-binary AFAB people use female or female/neutral pronouns, others use male pronouns (e.g., Elliot Page, many more prefer neutral pronouns, and it would be EXTRAORDINARY to claim that Utada prefers female pronouns at this time, particularly since we have reliable sources stating the opposite.
Has a formal RfC been opened? The !votes above suggest yes, but there is no indication of such having happened despite what looks like a general agreement for one. In the interim, the version without any pronouns at all does feel to be an adequate compromise—and a valid alternative overall per AngusWoof. ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 20:58, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
It makes me uncomfortable to be identified so markedly by my marital status or sex, and I don’t relate to any of those prefixes.) that
Utada self-identifies as non-binary, not femaleis very, very problematic and I would say violates BLP: indeed, the post actually refers to "female" as "my ... sex", and just says that the subject doesn't like using "prefixes" based on sex and marital status.
Singer Hikaru Utada announced on Instagram on Friday that they are nonbinary., with a link to the aforementioned Instagram post that definitely does not constitute by itself an "announce[ment] ... that they are nonbinary". I will admit that I am editing somewhat outside my wheelhouse here: if a non-specialist wrote an article for a news website that said that such-and-such pre-modern male waka poet's writing in the persona of a woman (for example) constituted an "announcement" of "being nonbinary", such a source could be easily dismissed as having been written by someone who had no idea what they are talking about (and such things have definitely happened many, many times with people citing ANN and other such sources in Wikipedia articles on academic topics, which has somewhat biased me against such sources), but I rarely edit either J-Pop (or pop culture in general) articles or articles on LGB or gender identity topics, so in this case I'm the non-specialist (and I know I'm in the minority regarding the "general reliability" of pop culture sources). This is, of course, not a "vote", so my comment can be taken for what it's worth in light of the fact that I hadn't noticed that our article already explicitly calls her non-binary, citing a source that I personally consider to be sub-par but others probably don't. Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 03:43, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
usable for anyone, including cisgender people, the fact is that in the general culture, use of "they" for a specific known person strongly implies that the person identifies as non-binary. Going without pronouns is definitely the safest option in this case. Crossroads -talk- 04:00, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
usable for anyone, including cisgender peopleis only really applicable in certain circumstances, such as an unspecified person whose gender is not known, a hypothetical person who doesn't have a known gender, or someone whose gender is being consciously hidden. As dated as season 7 of the American sitcom Friends is in many ways (the following season contained a very dated/cringeworthy reference to intersex individuals), it is somewhat telling that, when Rachel was pretending to have hired, as her assistant, a qualified elderly woman rather than an attractive young man with no experience, she repeatedly referred to "my new assistant" and avoided pronouns of any kind: "they/them" would, in the standard American English speech of the early 2000s, have given her away as deliberately concealing something; this "standard American English speech of the early 2000s" has changed somewhat in recent years, and people who were yet to be born as of 2000 might be surprised by this, but for the vast majority of cisgender article subjects who are as old as me or older, referring to them as "they/them" within their own articles (as opposed to speaking about them in general, as I am doing now), without any apparent reason, would come across as questioning their gender identity. Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 05:36, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
@ Hijiri88: @ FormalDude: To clarify for those editors who commented above, the Instagram livestream which contains Utada's declaration of being non-binary is publicly available here. -- GimmeChoco44 ( talk) 05:15, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
it's not like this is a personal website that's updated by UtadaI know that (you have no idea how intimately I know that... I recall pointing out the same thing with regard to whether a certain Japanese actor's talent agency's profile on him was a strong indication of his personal preference for how his name is romanized), but so far we have no reliable sources remotely connected to our subject herself that say she prefers different pronouns: just speculation by mostly straight, cisgender fans on various fansites saying that since she "is non-binary" she probably prefers this or that pronoun set (or -- while I doubt any of them would say this -- that she should prefer this or that pronoun set). Regardless of who curates these official social media profiles and official websites, they are the closest thing we have to our subject's personal preferences. It would be better if we had a neutral, third-party source (preferably a major newspaper or an academic work on LGBTQ+ studies or contemporary Japanese music) that discusses the discrepancy between how her website refers to her and how Wikipedia and various fansites like ANN refer to her, and the fact that her official Twitter account (no idea if it's actually our subject's Twitter account or an officially curated page actually operated by a nameless employee, although the fact that tweets are quite infrequent -- if someone was getting paid to tweet for me, I'd want them to do so at least once a week -- and the existence of this page indicate the former) notably does not specify "preferred pronouns" like seemingly the majority non-binary celebrities and many thousands of other Twitter users (seemingly mostly cisgender people showing solidarity), but at present it seems that we do not. We don't have any such source, and we don't even have anything closer to our subject (and therefore more likely to reflect our subject's personal preferences) than the above-linked website and Twitter profile; we just have third-party sources (seemingly mostly written by straight, cisgender, non-Japanese) speculating on how non-binary people like our subject "should" be referred to without any regard for our subject's actual personal preferences. (I'd be willing to accept that Utada's personal Twitter account, which seems to have been used no more than three or four times since 26 June, just hasn't been updated yet, but we don't have any evidence of that, and speculation would be inappropriate.) Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 08:36, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
making assumptions ... that the subject's personal website and TWitter profile are waiting to be updated. Rather, waiting for new informarion is the only way to avoid making assumptions one way or the other. We know the subject's latest self-declared identity, and unless you have seen something since then, we don't have a subsequent declaration on pronouns - we cannot assume that the prior pronoun usage does, or does not, now reflect the subject's current preference. We certainly cannot assume that because the subject already felt nonbinary before the announcement, that therefore nothing changed at the announcement so the pronouns should be assumed to stay the same. That really would be EXTRAORDINARY.
This is English wikipedia.The fact that you do not speak Utada's native language and the language of most of Utada's songs, and therefore have to rely on dubious readings of Wikipedia articles to tell you how to interpret the way Japanese people refer to themselves, is irrelevant. This is a Japanese topic, so most of the reliable sources (and virtually all of the first-party sources) are in Japanese (and therefore do not use third-person pronouns anywhere near as frequently as English sources). We use pronouns for non-binary people in accordance with their stated preference (not some prescriptive "rule" that non-binary individuals "should" use one or another set of pronouns), without making assumptions one way or the other. Since our subject does not have a (clearly) stated preference, we need to weigh the evidence; said evidence includes the use of female-only first-person pronouns by the subject after having come out as non-binary. It is not Wikipedia's place to be telling non-binary people (and certainly not English Wikipedia's place to be telling Japanese non-binary people) how they "should" be referred to.
even the work of the best publicists isn't as good a source as an independent RSYou have not located such an RS. We have an Instagram livestream given by the subject of the article and some fansites speculating on the "meaning" of said livestream. The closest I've found to a reliable third-party source is this, which mixes "she" with "their" and makes a general statement that
Non-binary people often use the pronouns "they/them".
Utada underwent surgery after being diagnosed with a benign ovarian tumor, causing them to put promotional activities on hold(which to most readers who don't specifically know about Utada as "an example of a non-binary celebrity" probably looks, with no reference to gender identity until the end of the article and no reference to preferred pronouns anywhere, like it's referring to "Utada and her retinue") seems (by forcing our readers to stop and Ctrl+F "gend...", "non-bi..." or some other keyword) like shouting "Utada is non-binary", which definitely goes against the spirit of ... just about everything our subject has said on the matter. Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 08:47, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Adding a break bc long section and also separate topic coming out of this. On what to do about the Mx. portion, mentioned way above, would it be possible to reword to separate the concepts? Because they feel both to be important as far as personal identity, just not necessarily related. There's likely a more elegant way to do this, but something like: "In discussing dislike for prefixes such as "Ms." and "Mrs.", Utada expressed support for the gender neutral prefix Mx. and also suggested Mys., a shortening of "mystery". On June 26, 2021, Utada came out as non-binary during an Instagram livestream."
Or, even leveraging the sentence about same-sex marriage: "On June 26, 2021, Utada came out as non-binary during an Instagram livestream. Utada has expressed support for same-sex marriage and for usage of the gender neutral prefix Mx., having also suggested a prefix Mys., a shortening of "mystery"." ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 16:50, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
I'm also not a big fame of "came out"; Utada did not say "I am proud to announce that" or anything to that effect, and in Japanese この数年で知って「あっ、それなんだ!」って思ったけど、日本でどれぐらい広まっていることかわからないけど「non-binary」に該当するなって最近知ったので it sounds even less like "coming out". The currently cited secondary source is definitely not sufficient to solve this, since they clearly did not ask Utada for clarification and seem to go as far as misidentifying "non-binary" with being gay or bisexual (by referencing a song apparently written shortly after Utada gave birth to a child with her/their then-husband, to whom she/they would remain married for another two years). Could we say Utada self-identified as
non-binary during an Instagram livestream
instead?
Hijiri 88 (
聖
やや) 02:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
This is not rocket science. The |publisher=
parameter is for THE PUBLISHING COMPANY, only, ever. The |work=
parameter (and its aliases like |website=
, |newspaper=
, |journal=
, |magazine=
) are for THE PUBLICATION, regardless of medium. Do not put website names in |publisher=
, either in title form (Salon) or domain name form (Salon.com). Do not add the |publisher=
parameter when it is redundant, i.e. identical or nearly identical to the publication. Every time you garble a citation, which makes it emit incorrect citation meta-data as well as show up with incorrect formatting, you waste the time of other editors who have to clean up after you. At least 30% of the citations in this article were incorrect. That's not okay, especially since a couple of years ago I had already cleaned them up before. I.e., someone went through and mucked them up again. If you are using a script that incorrectly puts website names as |publisher=
, stop using it, you are breaking things. Report the error to the author and ask them to fix it. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼 21:58, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Utada having been at one time theoretically eligible for US citizenship by virtue of having been born there is not a valid reason for asserting US citizenship in the article, and American (
jus soli, expatriate)
(in the infobox) reeks of
WP:OR. The lead is even worse, linking to the article
Japanese Americans (which is about Americans of Japanese ancestry) -- if our subject were under the age of 22 (and therefore likely possessing dual citizenship under the laws of both countries), hyphenating without linking to that article might be okay, but our article does not do that, and Utada lost the theoretical ability to possess dual citizenship 16 years ago. Utada is (universally?) considered to be a Japanese singer, and (while this is OR, it is part of a talk page comment and therefore explicitly permitted by policy, unlike the OR currently in the article) Japanese law does not allow people over the age of 22 to possess dual citizenship.
Does anyone have a source addressing these concerns? Because none are currently cited in the article.
Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 01:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
No comment on the various RMs, but Utada Hikaru [is] the only child of Teruzane Utada
is obviously problematic. Since the article title uses Japanese order, can we use Japanese naming order for all Japanese people named in the article?
Hijiri 88 (
聖
やや) 10:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
@ 79.65.101.219: Please explain why you are removing sourced information repeatedly. Your edit summary applies to only a tiny fraction of what you are removing, and is therefore unacceptable. ··· 日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:54, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 ( talk) 10:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Hikaru Utada →
Utada Hikaru – Per
MOS:IDENTITY and
MOS:JA, and consistent use in academic and other high-quality sources. Detailed rationale and source pile given in separate post below, so the
WP:RM page isn't clogged with a huge entry. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 07:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
The previous RM in 2008, which moved this article away from the earlier Utada Hikaru title, was based (albeit in good faith) on essentially nothing but the then-current wording of MOS:JA, which at that time strongly favored Western name order regardless of other considerations. I think the above MOS:IDENTITY and WP:ABOUTSELF argument is actually entirely sufficient for a move. However, a notable amount of debate was had about MOS:JA's wording throughout 2015 and perhaps earlier (I wasn't tracking it the whole time) and Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Japan-related articles#Personal names now provides a checklist of points to consider.
The #1 point on that list is: "Use the form personally or professionally used by the person, if available in the English/Latin alphabet (this can include the spelling appearing on their official website or official social media profile, but do not rely on a URL when the actual text is all Japanese)"
, and the evidence presented above perfectly complies with this. The previous RM noted a 7:1 Google hits ratio in favor of "Utada Hikaru" over "Hikaru Utada". A more carefully constructed search today still results in a 4.8:1 preference for "Utada Hikaru"
[5],
[6]. While
[7]. While the original RM showed a slight favoritism toward "Hikaru Utada" in a Google News search, Western news sources are notoriously bad for this kind of question, as they routinely force Western name order for lowest-common-denominator expediency reasons (this is also why we don't use stats about them in various other human-name-rendering RMs, such as those dealing with diacritics). Nevertheless, some use U.H. name order, including
Time magazine, despite that publication's American conservatism
[8], and them same could be said of New Statesman
[9]; however, plenty of news sources use H.U. order.
The next MOS:JA naming criterion: #2, appearance in other encyclopedias: "Utada Hikaru" is used in Continuum Encyclopedia of Popular Music of the World [10] which is professionally edited, but the opposite result was found in Encyclopedia.com [11], which seems to be pro-edited (and which has information we are missing, including on Utada's early bi-national life, BTW). I did also find "Hikaru Utada" in World Heritage Encyclopedia [12], but this is a false hit because its content is derived in part directly from our own (and it's very obvious in their article on this subject, which even has the same headings from an earlier version of our article). The Guinness Book of World Records uses U.H. order (she has a WR? why doesn't our article say so?) [13] [note: if the content is not visible at that link, it is here, 2nd entry: [14]], and in another of their publications [15] (if not visible, see top entry here: [16]]. Another tertiary source, The Children's Book of Music, gives the U.H. name order [17]. The Encyclopedia of World Pop Music, 1980-2001 gives all names in the form "Utada, Hikaru", so is of no help [18]; same goes for Contemporary Musicians: Profiles of the People in Music [19]. The "Hikaru UTADA" or "UTADA Hikaru" formats [20] are also of little relevance to WP. Other search results looking for such topical encyclopedia entries just turn up blogs and wikis and such [21].
Back to MOS:JA, #3 & #4 "Use the form publicly used on behalf of the person in the English-speaking world ... [or] in any other popular Latin-alphabet-using language"
: Utada's record/video labels consistently publish her material as "Utada Hikaru" or "Utada", never "Hikaru Utada"; there seems to be no other relevant party to consult, since no one else is using her name on her behalf. The 5th point only applies to diacritics.
The cited MOS:JA section also says: "Follow the usage of academic texts or a widely used reference such as a published encyclopedia in matters of spelling, macron usage, and name order. Such sources generally give Japanese names family name first."
There are few academic-journal sources with which to work. The industry (not academic) journal Perfect Beat has U.H. name order
[22], as does the German-language academic journal Digitale Jugendkulturen ('Digital Youth-culture')
[23], the Journal of the Society for Asian Music
[24], and the Journal of Japanese Trade & Industry
[25]. Same U.H. results in similar Japan-oriented trade journals, including Japan Spotlight
[26], Look Japan
[27], and many others; but this was not entirely consistent (I found three exceptions in this class of trade publication:
[28],
[29],
[30]). Academic books favor U.H. order, such as the media-studies volume Popular Culture Co-Productions and Collaborations in East and Southeast Asia
[31], Globalization and Popular Music in South Korea
[32], and Japan After Japan: Social and Cultural Life from the Recessionary 1990s to the Present
[33] (I can't find any that use H.U. order). Not sure Managing Media Companies counts as academic, except in an MBA sense, but it, too, has U.H. order, in a list with "Janet Jackson", etc.
[34] Non-academic English-language materials on Japanese pop culture naturally lean toward native Japanese name ordering, like Anime Reign
[35], etc., but this is not universal, as shown by Giant Robot
[36]. The above seems to be about the best we can do for a recent pop-culture figure.
Google N-grams and Books: An N-grams search produces results for "Utada Hikaru" but zero for "Hikaru Utada" (in a corpus that only has data up to 2008, and which I constrained to 1997 at the lower bound, to weed out any historical people with this name)
[37]. A Google "Books" search is useless statistically (though was how many of the cited sources were found, using a search string of "Utada Hikaru" OR "Hikaru Utada" -wikipedia
[38]); the majority of the results are Billboard Magazine (i.e., low-quality [added: namely,
tertiary and with
close fiduciary ties to the music industry] news material, not books) which seems to have a policy of forcibly westernizing names; self-published crap ("e-study guides", "mini-bios", etc.) that has to be ignored; and sheet music (which naturally follows the labels in using "Utada Hikaru"). Not all of the entertainment press is as jingoistic as Billboard:
[39],
[40]. Two pieces of professionally-published fiction that turned up (one in French) give U.H. name order when mentioning her in an in-context way
[41],
[42]. I stopped trawling these entries after about 10 or 12 screenfuls of results. The majority of the sources using H.U. order were either unreliable, or were newssources, and we already have GNews stats showing that they tend to favor that order, so I need not link them all here; I did include notable cases of "anti-U.H." results in the data above.
Overall, I think the case for a move back to Utada Hikaru is overwhelming, both on the basis of current WP:POLICY and per a preponderance of reliable, high-quality, non-news sources.
PS: Note that various of these sources can be WP:MINEd for additional information to use in this article, beyond the two I already highlighted for this purpose. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 07:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC) Updated with additional rationale. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 09:55, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Follow the usage of academic texts or a widely used reference such as a published encyclopedia in matters of spelling, macron usage, and name order. Such sources generally give Japanese names family name firstand
Use the form publicly used on behalf of the person in the English-speaking world ... [or] in any other popular Latin-alphabet-using languageto be most convincing here. I, JethroBT drop me a line 08:31, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Utada Hikaru. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Can someone please find a better (current) picture of Utada for use on the article? The last one(s) used are almost, if not more, than 10 years old. I'd do it myself, but I'd fear the wrath of not getting an appropriate, loyalty-free image. ( Jeimii ( talk) 21:02, 21 August 2016 (UTC))
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Utada Hikaru. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:58, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Im not sure make a decision Freackk ( talk) 22:19, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 11 external links on Utada Hikaru. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:18, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Utada Hikaru. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:43, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
There's all kinds of "an announcement was made that [something in the future]" stuff in this article about stuff that was in the future in, say, 2010, but which is now way in the past. This material needs to be rewritten to say what did happen rather than what was once planned to happen, or it's simply unencyclopedic "old news". — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 15:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
I like Utada, but I find this article to be hell to read because of the choppy prose and one section (2010–15) being overly long. The article doesn't even elaborate further on her musical styles, such as the types of sounds her albums convey or her lyrical topics. There's also no awards section whatsoever, and I can imagine with how big she is in Japan that'd she be nominated for several awards. (if hadn't not won any) Let's not forget the missing references in some sections either. Because of these reasons, I think that this article should be reduced to a C-class. 100cellsman ( talk) 05:40, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
This article needs a review to standardize referencing the performer by last/family name as the subject of sentences throughout.
Ref:
Katy Perry and
Kevin Hart are referenced by last name ("Perry did this"; "Hart did that") in standard encyclopedia/journalistic style.
Currently the article switches back and forth between her fist and last name. It should be "Utada" throughout.--
GimmeChoco44 (
talk) 09:11, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Typically, although Eastern name order is preferred by Japanese people when Romanizing their names, there isn't a general consensus on which name order to use in WP:JTITLE – hence, we have the article at Shinzo Abe, not Abe Shinzo. One could compare this to Qazaqstan vs. Kazakhstan or Chornobyl vs Chernobyl, where the natural transliteration isn't the one in common English usage. If the Western name order for Utada – or, indeed, the Eastern name order for other figures – garners greater usage, the matter can be revisited. However, in the case of Utada, the links provided by TJRC indicate her releases tend to be attributed to "Utada" or "Utada Hikaru". ( closed by non-admin page mover) Sceptre ( talk) 20:29, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Utada Hikaru →
Hikaru Utada – Her english name have to be "Hikaru Utada" as well as other japanese english names, like "
Shinzo Abe," "
Seiji Ozawa," "
Takeshi Kaneshiro," "
Kohei Uchida," "
Ayumu Hirano," "
Shizuka Arakawa," "
Satomi Ishihara, "
Yoko Ono." Moreover, up to now, her official website in english language has been calling her "Hikaru Utada." See
Hikaru Utada Official Website NEWS and
amazon.com. Her japanese name is "宇多田ヒカル," therefore, "Utada Hikaru" is just her japanese name's romanization. This means that "Utada Hikaru" cannot be her english name, even if some people have mistaken so. And then, I cannot help but think that nobody can discuss this critical mistake constructively, because this rule about japanese people's english name is already traditional rule and self-evident truth. Nobody, except nuts, can insist "Utada" is her first name. Nobody, except nuts, can insist her first name "Hikaru" should be placed at the position of english last name "Utada," ignoring english name's traditional rule and her will.
Beaver4100 (
talk) 22:30, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
I recently copied the defaultsort from here and added it to Template:Utada Hikaru songs to keep them consistent, but my edit was reverted. I found that the defaultsort here was changed on April 23, 2019, [45], and it currently sorts in categories by Hikaru, while the template, Template:Utada Hikaru, Utada Hikaru discography, List of songs recorded by Utada Hikaru and List of awards received by Utada Hikaru. I wanted to make sure which sorting was correct and make the articles and template consistent in their use. Aspects ( talk) 05:28, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
I couldn't figure out how I should word this to cover both problems, but I placed the tag where it was because ... well, this strikes me as similar to this: I've been trying, in the above discussion, to avoid all pronouns pending a "consensus" on how we should refer to our subject, and so I've been overusing our subject's surname, but I don't think it's not a "mononym" any more than "Biden". Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 02:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Considering the
Wikipedia guidelines for associated acts contained in the infobox:
1. Should
Teruzane Utada be removed? (cite: "producers, managers, etc." are in the "to be avoided" category)
2. Should
Shiina Ringo be added since she and Utada have more than one single together?
3. Are there any other artists who would qualify under these guidelines?
--
GimmeChoco44 (
talk) 18:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Has Utada announced which pronouns are correct? Given the Instagram post complaining about "Miss/Mrs/Ms" being used, it might be they/them? 2A02:8109:A33F:F27C:150A:8BDE:B6C2:17CC ( talk) 17:20, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
{{
pronoun}}
on other Wikipedia users to find their prefs, although updating preferences to newer pronouns has yet to be done.
AngusW🐶🐶F (
bark •
sniff) 23:32, 6 August 2021 (UTC)An IP editor today reinstated the plural they/them pronouns, but this time with a source. [1] Assuming todayonline.com is a WP:RS (I'm not familiar with it, so cannot opine either way), I think that's sufficient to support the change. TJRC ( talk) 03:17, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
References
Utada, who now uses the pronouns they/them...
Until Hikaru states explicitly that she wants a specific pronoun, standard English rules apply to this article. The quote attributed to her is not a definitive statement, and a commentary on marital status more than sexuality -- GimmeChoco44 ( talk) 22:05, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
standard English, what pronouns does one use when they do not know what a person's pronoun preference is (or doesn't known the gender of a person at all)? They/them. So the correct choice, per policy, is pretty dang obvious. Newimpartial ( talk) 22:29, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
factual referencefor a pronoun choice before changing the pronouns. Since we do not know for sure the subject's preference, we use
standard Englishthey/them far he than
past usagegendered pronouns - the past usage simply no longer applies after a gender identity announcement. Newimpartial ( talk) 22:40, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
explicitly declared pronouns? We have a reliable source reporting a gender identity declaration as nonbinary; that is enough to require us to strip out all gendered pronouns for now. Newimpartial ( talk) 23:31, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Newimpartial ( talk) 01:12, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Refer to any person whose gender might be questioned with gendered words (e.g. pronouns, "man/woman", "waiter/waitress") that reflect the person's latest expressed gender self-identification as reported in the most recent reliable sources, even if it does not match what is most common in sources.. By this logic, pronouns should be she/her until Utada directly addresses her pronouns, not just her gender. Unnamed anon ( talk) 23:14, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
last expressed gender self-identificationis non-binary, not female. While some non-binary AFAB people use female or female/neutral pronouns, others use male pronouns (e.g., Elliot Page, many more prefer neutral pronouns, and it would be EXTRAORDINARY to claim that Utada prefers female pronouns at this time, particularly since we have reliable sources stating the opposite.
Has a formal RfC been opened? The !votes above suggest yes, but there is no indication of such having happened despite what looks like a general agreement for one. In the interim, the version without any pronouns at all does feel to be an adequate compromise—and a valid alternative overall per AngusWoof. ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 20:58, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
It makes me uncomfortable to be identified so markedly by my marital status or sex, and I don’t relate to any of those prefixes.) that
Utada self-identifies as non-binary, not femaleis very, very problematic and I would say violates BLP: indeed, the post actually refers to "female" as "my ... sex", and just says that the subject doesn't like using "prefixes" based on sex and marital status.
Singer Hikaru Utada announced on Instagram on Friday that they are nonbinary., with a link to the aforementioned Instagram post that definitely does not constitute by itself an "announce[ment] ... that they are nonbinary". I will admit that I am editing somewhat outside my wheelhouse here: if a non-specialist wrote an article for a news website that said that such-and-such pre-modern male waka poet's writing in the persona of a woman (for example) constituted an "announcement" of "being nonbinary", such a source could be easily dismissed as having been written by someone who had no idea what they are talking about (and such things have definitely happened many, many times with people citing ANN and other such sources in Wikipedia articles on academic topics, which has somewhat biased me against such sources), but I rarely edit either J-Pop (or pop culture in general) articles or articles on LGB or gender identity topics, so in this case I'm the non-specialist (and I know I'm in the minority regarding the "general reliability" of pop culture sources). This is, of course, not a "vote", so my comment can be taken for what it's worth in light of the fact that I hadn't noticed that our article already explicitly calls her non-binary, citing a source that I personally consider to be sub-par but others probably don't. Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 03:43, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
usable for anyone, including cisgender people, the fact is that in the general culture, use of "they" for a specific known person strongly implies that the person identifies as non-binary. Going without pronouns is definitely the safest option in this case. Crossroads -talk- 04:00, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
usable for anyone, including cisgender peopleis only really applicable in certain circumstances, such as an unspecified person whose gender is not known, a hypothetical person who doesn't have a known gender, or someone whose gender is being consciously hidden. As dated as season 7 of the American sitcom Friends is in many ways (the following season contained a very dated/cringeworthy reference to intersex individuals), it is somewhat telling that, when Rachel was pretending to have hired, as her assistant, a qualified elderly woman rather than an attractive young man with no experience, she repeatedly referred to "my new assistant" and avoided pronouns of any kind: "they/them" would, in the standard American English speech of the early 2000s, have given her away as deliberately concealing something; this "standard American English speech of the early 2000s" has changed somewhat in recent years, and people who were yet to be born as of 2000 might be surprised by this, but for the vast majority of cisgender article subjects who are as old as me or older, referring to them as "they/them" within their own articles (as opposed to speaking about them in general, as I am doing now), without any apparent reason, would come across as questioning their gender identity. Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 05:36, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
@ Hijiri88: @ FormalDude: To clarify for those editors who commented above, the Instagram livestream which contains Utada's declaration of being non-binary is publicly available here. -- GimmeChoco44 ( talk) 05:15, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
it's not like this is a personal website that's updated by UtadaI know that (you have no idea how intimately I know that... I recall pointing out the same thing with regard to whether a certain Japanese actor's talent agency's profile on him was a strong indication of his personal preference for how his name is romanized), but so far we have no reliable sources remotely connected to our subject herself that say she prefers different pronouns: just speculation by mostly straight, cisgender fans on various fansites saying that since she "is non-binary" she probably prefers this or that pronoun set (or -- while I doubt any of them would say this -- that she should prefer this or that pronoun set). Regardless of who curates these official social media profiles and official websites, they are the closest thing we have to our subject's personal preferences. It would be better if we had a neutral, third-party source (preferably a major newspaper or an academic work on LGBTQ+ studies or contemporary Japanese music) that discusses the discrepancy between how her website refers to her and how Wikipedia and various fansites like ANN refer to her, and the fact that her official Twitter account (no idea if it's actually our subject's Twitter account or an officially curated page actually operated by a nameless employee, although the fact that tweets are quite infrequent -- if someone was getting paid to tweet for me, I'd want them to do so at least once a week -- and the existence of this page indicate the former) notably does not specify "preferred pronouns" like seemingly the majority non-binary celebrities and many thousands of other Twitter users (seemingly mostly cisgender people showing solidarity), but at present it seems that we do not. We don't have any such source, and we don't even have anything closer to our subject (and therefore more likely to reflect our subject's personal preferences) than the above-linked website and Twitter profile; we just have third-party sources (seemingly mostly written by straight, cisgender, non-Japanese) speculating on how non-binary people like our subject "should" be referred to without any regard for our subject's actual personal preferences. (I'd be willing to accept that Utada's personal Twitter account, which seems to have been used no more than three or four times since 26 June, just hasn't been updated yet, but we don't have any evidence of that, and speculation would be inappropriate.) Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 08:36, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
making assumptions ... that the subject's personal website and TWitter profile are waiting to be updated. Rather, waiting for new informarion is the only way to avoid making assumptions one way or the other. We know the subject's latest self-declared identity, and unless you have seen something since then, we don't have a subsequent declaration on pronouns - we cannot assume that the prior pronoun usage does, or does not, now reflect the subject's current preference. We certainly cannot assume that because the subject already felt nonbinary before the announcement, that therefore nothing changed at the announcement so the pronouns should be assumed to stay the same. That really would be EXTRAORDINARY.
This is English wikipedia.The fact that you do not speak Utada's native language and the language of most of Utada's songs, and therefore have to rely on dubious readings of Wikipedia articles to tell you how to interpret the way Japanese people refer to themselves, is irrelevant. This is a Japanese topic, so most of the reliable sources (and virtually all of the first-party sources) are in Japanese (and therefore do not use third-person pronouns anywhere near as frequently as English sources). We use pronouns for non-binary people in accordance with their stated preference (not some prescriptive "rule" that non-binary individuals "should" use one or another set of pronouns), without making assumptions one way or the other. Since our subject does not have a (clearly) stated preference, we need to weigh the evidence; said evidence includes the use of female-only first-person pronouns by the subject after having come out as non-binary. It is not Wikipedia's place to be telling non-binary people (and certainly not English Wikipedia's place to be telling Japanese non-binary people) how they "should" be referred to.
even the work of the best publicists isn't as good a source as an independent RSYou have not located such an RS. We have an Instagram livestream given by the subject of the article and some fansites speculating on the "meaning" of said livestream. The closest I've found to a reliable third-party source is this, which mixes "she" with "their" and makes a general statement that
Non-binary people often use the pronouns "they/them".
Utada underwent surgery after being diagnosed with a benign ovarian tumor, causing them to put promotional activities on hold(which to most readers who don't specifically know about Utada as "an example of a non-binary celebrity" probably looks, with no reference to gender identity until the end of the article and no reference to preferred pronouns anywhere, like it's referring to "Utada and her retinue") seems (by forcing our readers to stop and Ctrl+F "gend...", "non-bi..." or some other keyword) like shouting "Utada is non-binary", which definitely goes against the spirit of ... just about everything our subject has said on the matter. Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 08:47, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Adding a break bc long section and also separate topic coming out of this. On what to do about the Mx. portion, mentioned way above, would it be possible to reword to separate the concepts? Because they feel both to be important as far as personal identity, just not necessarily related. There's likely a more elegant way to do this, but something like: "In discussing dislike for prefixes such as "Ms." and "Mrs.", Utada expressed support for the gender neutral prefix Mx. and also suggested Mys., a shortening of "mystery". On June 26, 2021, Utada came out as non-binary during an Instagram livestream."
Or, even leveraging the sentence about same-sex marriage: "On June 26, 2021, Utada came out as non-binary during an Instagram livestream. Utada has expressed support for same-sex marriage and for usage of the gender neutral prefix Mx., having also suggested a prefix Mys., a shortening of "mystery"." ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 16:50, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
I'm also not a big fame of "came out"; Utada did not say "I am proud to announce that" or anything to that effect, and in Japanese この数年で知って「あっ、それなんだ!」って思ったけど、日本でどれぐらい広まっていることかわからないけど「non-binary」に該当するなって最近知ったので it sounds even less like "coming out". The currently cited secondary source is definitely not sufficient to solve this, since they clearly did not ask Utada for clarification and seem to go as far as misidentifying "non-binary" with being gay or bisexual (by referencing a song apparently written shortly after Utada gave birth to a child with her/their then-husband, to whom she/they would remain married for another two years). Could we say Utada self-identified as
non-binary during an Instagram livestream
instead?
Hijiri 88 (
聖
やや) 02:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
This is not rocket science. The |publisher=
parameter is for THE PUBLISHING COMPANY, only, ever. The |work=
parameter (and its aliases like |website=
, |newspaper=
, |journal=
, |magazine=
) are for THE PUBLICATION, regardless of medium. Do not put website names in |publisher=
, either in title form (Salon) or domain name form (Salon.com). Do not add the |publisher=
parameter when it is redundant, i.e. identical or nearly identical to the publication. Every time you garble a citation, which makes it emit incorrect citation meta-data as well as show up with incorrect formatting, you waste the time of other editors who have to clean up after you. At least 30% of the citations in this article were incorrect. That's not okay, especially since a couple of years ago I had already cleaned them up before. I.e., someone went through and mucked them up again. If you are using a script that incorrectly puts website names as |publisher=
, stop using it, you are breaking things. Report the error to the author and ask them to fix it. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼 21:58, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Utada having been at one time theoretically eligible for US citizenship by virtue of having been born there is not a valid reason for asserting US citizenship in the article, and American (
jus soli, expatriate)
(in the infobox) reeks of
WP:OR. The lead is even worse, linking to the article
Japanese Americans (which is about Americans of Japanese ancestry) -- if our subject were under the age of 22 (and therefore likely possessing dual citizenship under the laws of both countries), hyphenating without linking to that article might be okay, but our article does not do that, and Utada lost the theoretical ability to possess dual citizenship 16 years ago. Utada is (universally?) considered to be a Japanese singer, and (while this is OR, it is part of a talk page comment and therefore explicitly permitted by policy, unlike the OR currently in the article) Japanese law does not allow people over the age of 22 to possess dual citizenship.
Does anyone have a source addressing these concerns? Because none are currently cited in the article.
Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 01:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
No comment on the various RMs, but Utada Hikaru [is] the only child of Teruzane Utada
is obviously problematic. Since the article title uses Japanese order, can we use Japanese naming order for all Japanese people named in the article?
Hijiri 88 (
聖
やや) 10:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)