 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Philippine National Railways Metro Commuter Line. |
{{geodata-check}}
The following coordinate fixes are needed for
— 121.54.54.46 ( talk) 05:27, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
 | It was proposed in this section that multiple pages be
renamed and moved.
result: Links:
current log •
target log
This is template {{
subst:Requested move/end}} |
- Santa Rosa (PNR station) → Santa Rosa station (PNR)
- Tutuban station (PNR) → Tutuban station
- Agdangan railway station → Agdangan station
- Alacan railway station → Alacan station
- Apalit railway station → Apalit station
- Baao railway station → Baao station
- Balagtas railway station → Balagtas station
- Bato railway station → Bato station
- Bocaue railway station → Bocaue station
- Calumpit railway station → Calumpit station
- Dagupan railway station → Dagupan station
- Daraga railway station → Daraga station
- Guiguinto railway station → Guiguinto station
- Gumaca railway station → Gumaca station
- Hondagua railway station → Hondagua station
- Iriga railway station → Iriga station
- Legazpi railway station → Legazpi station
- Libmanan railway station → Libmanan station
- Ligao railway station → Ligao station
- Lucena railway station → Lucena station
- Lupi Viejo railway station → Lupi Viejo station
- Malansad railway station → Malansad station
- Malolos railway station → Malolos station
- Marilao railway station → Marilao station
- Matacon railway station → Matacon station
- Meycauayan railway station → Meycauayan station
- Naga railway station → Naga station
- Oas railway station → Oas station
- Pamplona PNR railway station → Pamplona station
- Pili railway station → Pili station
- Plaridel railway station → Plaridel station
- Polangui railway station → Polangui station
- Ragay railway station → Ragay station
- Sampaloc railway station → Sampaloc station
- San Fernando railway station (Pampanga) → San Fernando station (Pampanga)
- San Pablo railway station → San Pablo station (PNR)
- Sipocot railway station → Sipocot station
- Tagkawayan railway station → Tagkawayan station
- Travesia railway station → Travesia station
- Valenzuela railway station → Valenzuela station
– Have talked about this on
Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines#Train station names again, but by personal experience, the most common written forms of the station names use a capitalized "Station". RS have mixed usage, but uses with "Station" in caps are more common, and appears to be the de facto standard in Philippine English. "X station" is the most common usage for these stations (and for all others in the Philippines). Philippine train station names suffer from a lack of standardization: there are some discussions previously on
WT:TAMBAY but those haven't set a standard, and only articles of stations around Metro Manila and suburbs got renamed, yet with different naming schemes.
For Tutuban station, WP:PRIMARYTOPIC: "Tutuban station" would normally refer to the PNR station, so no disamb is needed. - TagaSanPedroAko ( talk) 21:34, 12 May 2020 (UTC) —Relisted. P.I. Ellsworth ed. put'r there 02:38, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note Initial discussion was about an earlier proposal to rename X station and X railway station to X Station. Certes ( talk) 23:52, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Survey 1
Survey responses before this request was altered
|
|---|
|
Survey 2
Note. Please add new supports and opposes below based upon this newly altered request that was changed by the nominator at 23:47, 16 May 2020. P.I. Ellsworth ed. put'r there 02:47, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support - Cards 84664 05:08, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support the revised proposal with lowercase station. Dicklyon ( talk) 05:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support – again, per WP:TITLEFORMAT. However, I oppose moving Tutuban station (PNR) since there's an approved west extension already for Line 2. For San Fernando railway station (Pampanga), it should be moved to San Fernando station (PNR) only. The San Fernando station in La Union is officially named as San Fernando U station, as shown in these photographs: platform signage | GM's report, 1929 | station building. — Hiwilms ( talk) 05:42, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- @
Hiwilms: I would still insist the PNR station is the primary topic of Tutuban station, so why keep the disamb that got added when it should have not? Better put a disamb for the LRT Line 2 station ("
Tutuban station (LRT)", and the NSCR one ("
Tutuban station (North-South Commuter Railway)"), not on the existing one that is the obvious WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.-
TagaSanPedroAko (
talk) 08:40, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think this would really apply to station articles like these. I think there should be disambiguation for these three stations, especially that they are not housed on a single building/structure and they are owned by two different operators.
Hiwilms
Talk 10:00, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- But not until those stations are built, and by the way, Tutuban station's WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is still the PNR station, so I'm still wondering how the disamb made its way into the name after we discussed train station names in WT:TAMBAY. Also pinging in RioHondo and Sky Harbor for comments. - TagaSanPedroAko ( talk) 17:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think this would really apply to station articles like these. I think there should be disambiguation for these three stations, especially that they are not housed on a single building/structure and they are owned by two different operators.
Hiwilms
Talk 10:00, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- @
Hiwilms: I would still insist the PNR station is the primary topic of Tutuban station, so why keep the disamb that got added when it should have not? Better put a disamb for the LRT Line 2 station ("
Tutuban station (LRT)", and the NSCR one ("
Tutuban station (North-South Commuter Railway)"), not on the existing one that is the obvious WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.-
TagaSanPedroAko (
talk) 08:40, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support — "station" indeed must be in lowercase. That follows suit on WP policies as well. The only major consideration is for disambiguation. {{u| Koressha}} { interact| ambags} 06:19, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support Sentence case station. At this point in time, Tutuban station refers to the PNR station. If and when another station named "Tutuban" is built in the Philippines, then can we revisit. Howard the Duck ( talk) 10:30, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support lower-casing "station" is a well-settled principle at this point. Mackensen (talk) 12:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support the general proposal for consistency, both internally and with stations in most other countries. We may wish to discuss special cases such as Tutuaban and San Fernando separately. Certes ( talk) 13:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support the revised nomination. AlgaeGraphix ( talk) 14:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support the revised nom. ITSQUIETUPTOWN talk • contribs 08:58, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Discussion
- Note: I have notified WikiProject Trains of this discussion. - Certes ( talk) 22:41, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- A couple of technical points:
5th Avenue station is a disambiguation page. You may wish to consider moving
5th Avenue station (PNR) instead. Also,
Buendia station redirects to
Buendia station (Line 3).
Certes (
talk) 23:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Just a note, I propose renaming this (Tutuban station) as simply Tutuban, without a parenthetical disamb, as this is the only station with that name and the present one is the primary topic. There's another Tutuban Station under construction to the south (to serve electric-powered commuter trains), but this focuses on the present station that replaced the heritage one converted into a mall (which the new one will be around). -- TagaSanPedroAko ( talk) 00:30, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: See
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (US stations)/NYC Subway RfC for a recent discussion on this topic.
(Pinging all those who often concern themselves with these discussions @ Cards84664, Cuchullain, DanTD, Dicklyon, Epicgenius, Jc86035, Mackensen, Mjroots, Oknazevad, Pi.1415926535, Redrose64, Some Gadget Geek, Szqecs, Thryduulf, Useddenim, and Vcohen:.) AlgaeGraphix ( talk) 04:11, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - Wow, it's amazing how many of these station names are also shared with those in California, and other places with Spanish names. This has been why I've opposed the current naming convention for so long. --------- User:DanTD ( talk) 04:30, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: We use sentence case for the title — "station" in lowercase. — Hiwilms ( talk) 06:16, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Since this is also an issue by the Tambayan Philippines community, I think we invite local users for their opinions on this. Pinging in: @ Sky Harbor:, @ Howard the Duck:, @ RioHondo:, @ Korean Rail Fan:, @ Koressha: @ Hiwilms:, @ Hariboneagle927:. TagaSanPedroAko ( talk) 06:46, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment We are aware of the dire lack unified of standards in Philippine transit, let alone railways. We must define our own; hence, 1) may I quote:
We use sentence case for the title — "station" in lowercase; [sic] ...disambiguate articles properly, "Santa Rosa station (PNR)".
— User:Hiwilms 06:29, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- If we can all agree that the sentence case should be in lowercase, and this is what we would refer to as grammatically correct, then might as well support the RM. 2) If this is widely used in other countries (as
Dicklyon said re: the
MOS:CAPS basic scheme and
WP:USSTATION and
WP:UKSTATION, then so be it; overseas Filipinos might benefit from this as well. 3) Our stations are not run by Japan; hence we can choose which MOS or rules to follow.
If all else fails, WP:IAF.4) Lastly, maybe it would be better to establish this and a few other standards as well in a WikiProject? {{u| Koressha}} { interact| ambags} 07:19, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Please do not move
5th Avenue station (PNR) →
5th Avenue Station or
Santa Rosa (PNR station) →
Santa Rosa Station. This would cause confusion with similarly named stations listed on disambiguation pages
5th Avenue station and
Santa Rosa station.
Certes (
talk) 11:26, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- I'll move them with the appropriate disamb.-- TagaSanPedroAko ( talk) 23:29, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment. No vote either way, but a cursory glance at Google News searches for Dela Rosa station shows the Title Case variant with more usages than the Sentence case variant, around 3:2. Not much, but since this is an RM, there should be convincing evidence that the new title, in this case, the Title Case variant satisfies WP:NC. I say it's debatable, at least when Dela Rosa station is concerned. I also used this random sampling for the Blumentritt LRT station (LOL currently located in a badly named title), and differences in usage aren't that far apart on that one either. Howard the Duck ( talk) 11:39, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment It could make sense to move pages in order to have Station included in their titles. But, given that we have an existing project-wide consensus that does not have an overriding local consensus yet (unless if we decide to make one eventually, which would be another long and convoluted process), the status quo may be left to stand for now. It's oddly interesting that the local consensus for the railways and stations in Japan are different from almost anywhere else, but that probably points to how the companies there run their railways so well. LSGH ( talk) ( contributions) 13:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- @
LSGH: Have read this
RM thread of a South Korea train station which included a station in Japan, as well as other RMs involving renaming of stations in Korea and elsewhere with titles in sentence case, I now agree that train station names, regardless of where country they are in or what the signs say, should be normally sentence case. Nevertheless, we're still seeing controversial moves, such as with
Seoul's central train station. --
TagaSanPedroAko (
talk) 02:26, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Agree that Japan is an odd outlier and ought to be fixed. Keep in mind too that there are exceptions, where Station is an inherent part of a name, like "Union Station" in various places. My look at sources suggests that
Seoul Station may be such an exception; not sure.
Dicklyon (
talk) 05:16, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- I saw the recent set of moves that involved stations in Korea. I was inclining to support the most recent move back to using uppercase for a handful of railway stations (while agreeing to using lowercase for most others), but only to note that these railway stations are often shared with subway stations, where the use of station is the norm. As for Japan, some others say that there were government-issued guidelines that became the basis for the long-standing MOS convention there.
LSGH (
talk) (
contributions) 15:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- @
Dicklyon: For Japanese train stations, agree with making them follow the project-wide guidelines, with possible exceptions at least for large central intermodal stations, especially those in the center of large cities (e.g. Tokyo and Shinjuku). For Seoul Station, same thing as above (can do the same as well for large central stations of other cities). Be bold and discuss that with the Japanese and Korean regional WikiProjects.
TagaSanPedroAko (
talk) 00:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not ready to take on Japan yet, as their local consensus will probably involve a fight to try to straighten out. Korea seems to be settled now, except for what the exceptions might be, and I'm open to hearing more about those. The US is nicely settled for station (without much help from me), but is a holdout for "Line" and sometimes other things (like subway, branch, tunnel) where caps are clearly not well supported by sources. For example , we have probably a few thousand articles with "New York City Subway" even though the MTA that runs that system mostly does not cap "subway" in that expression. But the subway fans didn't want to hear that; if it's capped on the map title, that's good enough for them. That's not a battle I can win, even with the backing of the handful of editors who regularly support going along with MOS guidance. Until there are more editors who care about the MOS, there will be some of these rogue styles. Dicklyon ( talk) 03:09, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- @
Dicklyon: For Japanese train stations, agree with making them follow the project-wide guidelines, with possible exceptions at least for large central intermodal stations, especially those in the center of large cities (e.g. Tokyo and Shinjuku). For Seoul Station, same thing as above (can do the same as well for large central stations of other cities). Be bold and discuss that with the Japanese and Korean regional WikiProjects.
TagaSanPedroAko (
talk) 00:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- I saw the recent set of moves that involved stations in Korea. I was inclining to support the most recent move back to using uppercase for a handful of railway stations (while agreeing to using lowercase for most others), but only to note that these railway stations are often shared with subway stations, where the use of station is the norm. As for Japan, some others say that there were government-issued guidelines that became the basis for the long-standing MOS convention there.
LSGH (
talk) (
contributions) 15:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Agree that Japan is an odd outlier and ought to be fixed. Keep in mind too that there are exceptions, where Station is an inherent part of a name, like "Union Station" in various places. My look at sources suggests that
Seoul Station may be such an exception; not sure.
Dicklyon (
talk) 05:16, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- @
LSGH: Have read this
RM thread of a South Korea train station which included a station in Japan, as well as other RMs involving renaming of stations in Korea and elsewhere with titles in sentence case, I now agree that train station names, regardless of where country they are in or what the signs say, should be normally sentence case. Nevertheless, we're still seeing controversial moves, such as with
Seoul's central train station. --
TagaSanPedroAko (
talk) 02:26, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment While we're on the issue of station consistency, I'd like uninvolved editors to look at and/or continue the stale discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Canadian stations)#GO station naming, and voice their opinions on naming formats for Toronto's commuter rail system. Cards 84664 00:57, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment What about the stations set to be renamed (e.g Pacita MG to Pacita, Governor Pascual to Malabon)? Also while were at it, we should make standards for naming the stations of rapid transit/metro and mainline rail (and maybe even the colors of the railway lines). ITSQUIETUPTOWN talk • contribs 09:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Itsquietuptown's statements are exactly my thoughts; owing to the lack of organized standards here in our local railways.
- Perhaps we have to 1) identify the proper naming convention (yet we are here in 'Station' vs 'station') that is and would be more correct to the Filipino's knowledge on grammar and usage. Then 2) for instances like "Pacita Main Gate", we can consider the colloquial usage (how do local commuters call it, is it "Pacita station" or "Pacita MG station"? 3) Disambs in parentheses are not a problem (as echoed above)
iff there is another station of the same name. 4) If an exception really has to be considered, then might as well respect that. Regardless, things are subject to change which is why we constantly edit over time. Pinging in other members who might chime in: @
Raku Hachijo and
BicolExpressHunter: and quick question, is "5th Avenue station (PNR)" a more common name than "C-3 station"? {{ping|
Koressha}} {
interact|
ambags} 10:23, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- @
Koressha: I'm from the far south of Manila, so I don't know which one between 5th Avenue and C-3 is preferred for that station's name. Now let's see if we can get one who's from the area to respond.
Raku Hachijo (
talk) 01:53, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah it's alright; the question is for anyone in this thread, though what you can say re: 'Station' or 'station' is why I tagged other editors like you. It surely will count. {{ping|
Koressha}} {
interact|
ambags} 02:09, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- 5th Avenue station is 5th Avenue. Station code is "5TH" as seen on a Rappler article on PNR's punctuality. Hiwilms Talk 06:39, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah it's alright; the question is for anyone in this thread, though what you can say re: 'Station' or 'station' is why I tagged other editors like you. It surely will count. {{ping|
Koressha}} {
interact|
ambags} 02:09, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- @
Koressha: I'm from the far south of Manila, so I don't know which one between 5th Avenue and C-3 is preferred for that station's name. Now let's see if we can get one who's from the area to respond.
Raku Hachijo (
talk) 01:53, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 03:56, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Philippine National Railways Metro Commuter Line. |
{{geodata-check}}
The following coordinate fixes are needed for
— 121.54.54.46 ( talk) 05:27, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
| It was proposed in this section that multiple pages be
renamed and moved.
result: Links:
current log •
target log
This is template {{
subst:Requested move/end}} |
- Santa Rosa (PNR station) → Santa Rosa station (PNR)
- Tutuban station (PNR) → Tutuban station
- Agdangan railway station → Agdangan station
- Alacan railway station → Alacan station
- Apalit railway station → Apalit station
- Baao railway station → Baao station
- Balagtas railway station → Balagtas station
- Bato railway station → Bato station
- Bocaue railway station → Bocaue station
- Calumpit railway station → Calumpit station
- Dagupan railway station → Dagupan station
- Daraga railway station → Daraga station
- Guiguinto railway station → Guiguinto station
- Gumaca railway station → Gumaca station
- Hondagua railway station → Hondagua station
- Iriga railway station → Iriga station
- Legazpi railway station → Legazpi station
- Libmanan railway station → Libmanan station
- Ligao railway station → Ligao station
- Lucena railway station → Lucena station
- Lupi Viejo railway station → Lupi Viejo station
- Malansad railway station → Malansad station
- Malolos railway station → Malolos station
- Marilao railway station → Marilao station
- Matacon railway station → Matacon station
- Meycauayan railway station → Meycauayan station
- Naga railway station → Naga station
- Oas railway station → Oas station
- Pamplona PNR railway station → Pamplona station
- Pili railway station → Pili station
- Plaridel railway station → Plaridel station
- Polangui railway station → Polangui station
- Ragay railway station → Ragay station
- Sampaloc railway station → Sampaloc station
- San Fernando railway station (Pampanga) → San Fernando station (Pampanga)
- San Pablo railway station → San Pablo station (PNR)
- Sipocot railway station → Sipocot station
- Tagkawayan railway station → Tagkawayan station
- Travesia railway station → Travesia station
- Valenzuela railway station → Valenzuela station
– Have talked about this on
Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines#Train station names again, but by personal experience, the most common written forms of the station names use a capitalized "Station". RS have mixed usage, but uses with "Station" in caps are more common, and appears to be the de facto standard in Philippine English. "X station" is the most common usage for these stations (and for all others in the Philippines). Philippine train station names suffer from a lack of standardization: there are some discussions previously on
WT:TAMBAY but those haven't set a standard, and only articles of stations around Metro Manila and suburbs got renamed, yet with different naming schemes.
For Tutuban station, WP:PRIMARYTOPIC: "Tutuban station" would normally refer to the PNR station, so no disamb is needed. - TagaSanPedroAko ( talk) 21:34, 12 May 2020 (UTC) —Relisted. P.I. Ellsworth ed. put'r there 02:38, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note Initial discussion was about an earlier proposal to rename X station and X railway station to X Station. Certes ( talk) 23:52, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Survey 1
Survey responses before this request was altered
|
|---|
|
Survey 2
Note. Please add new supports and opposes below based upon this newly altered request that was changed by the nominator at 23:47, 16 May 2020. P.I. Ellsworth ed. put'r there 02:47, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support - Cards 84664 05:08, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support the revised proposal with lowercase station. Dicklyon ( talk) 05:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support – again, per WP:TITLEFORMAT. However, I oppose moving Tutuban station (PNR) since there's an approved west extension already for Line 2. For San Fernando railway station (Pampanga), it should be moved to San Fernando station (PNR) only. The San Fernando station in La Union is officially named as San Fernando U station, as shown in these photographs: platform signage | GM's report, 1929 | station building. — Hiwilms ( talk) 05:42, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- @
Hiwilms: I would still insist the PNR station is the primary topic of Tutuban station, so why keep the disamb that got added when it should have not? Better put a disamb for the LRT Line 2 station ("
Tutuban station (LRT)", and the NSCR one ("
Tutuban station (North-South Commuter Railway)"), not on the existing one that is the obvious WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.-
TagaSanPedroAko (
talk) 08:40, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think this would really apply to station articles like these. I think there should be disambiguation for these three stations, especially that they are not housed on a single building/structure and they are owned by two different operators.
Hiwilms
Talk 10:00, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- But not until those stations are built, and by the way, Tutuban station's WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is still the PNR station, so I'm still wondering how the disamb made its way into the name after we discussed train station names in WT:TAMBAY. Also pinging in RioHondo and Sky Harbor for comments. - TagaSanPedroAko ( talk) 17:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think this would really apply to station articles like these. I think there should be disambiguation for these three stations, especially that they are not housed on a single building/structure and they are owned by two different operators.
Hiwilms
Talk 10:00, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- @
Hiwilms: I would still insist the PNR station is the primary topic of Tutuban station, so why keep the disamb that got added when it should have not? Better put a disamb for the LRT Line 2 station ("
Tutuban station (LRT)", and the NSCR one ("
Tutuban station (North-South Commuter Railway)"), not on the existing one that is the obvious WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.-
TagaSanPedroAko (
talk) 08:40, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support — "station" indeed must be in lowercase. That follows suit on WP policies as well. The only major consideration is for disambiguation. {{u| Koressha}} { interact| ambags} 06:19, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support Sentence case station. At this point in time, Tutuban station refers to the PNR station. If and when another station named "Tutuban" is built in the Philippines, then can we revisit. Howard the Duck ( talk) 10:30, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support lower-casing "station" is a well-settled principle at this point. Mackensen (talk) 12:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support the general proposal for consistency, both internally and with stations in most other countries. We may wish to discuss special cases such as Tutuaban and San Fernando separately. Certes ( talk) 13:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support the revised nomination. AlgaeGraphix ( talk) 14:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support the revised nom. ITSQUIETUPTOWN talk • contribs 08:58, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Discussion
- Note: I have notified WikiProject Trains of this discussion. - Certes ( talk) 22:41, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- A couple of technical points:
5th Avenue station is a disambiguation page. You may wish to consider moving
5th Avenue station (PNR) instead. Also,
Buendia station redirects to
Buendia station (Line 3).
Certes (
talk) 23:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Just a note, I propose renaming this (Tutuban station) as simply Tutuban, without a parenthetical disamb, as this is the only station with that name and the present one is the primary topic. There's another Tutuban Station under construction to the south (to serve electric-powered commuter trains), but this focuses on the present station that replaced the heritage one converted into a mall (which the new one will be around). -- TagaSanPedroAko ( talk) 00:30, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: See
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (US stations)/NYC Subway RfC for a recent discussion on this topic.
(Pinging all those who often concern themselves with these discussions @ Cards84664, Cuchullain, DanTD, Dicklyon, Epicgenius, Jc86035, Mackensen, Mjroots, Oknazevad, Pi.1415926535, Redrose64, Some Gadget Geek, Szqecs, Thryduulf, Useddenim, and Vcohen:.) AlgaeGraphix ( talk) 04:11, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - Wow, it's amazing how many of these station names are also shared with those in California, and other places with Spanish names. This has been why I've opposed the current naming convention for so long. --------- User:DanTD ( talk) 04:30, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: We use sentence case for the title — "station" in lowercase. — Hiwilms ( talk) 06:16, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Since this is also an issue by the Tambayan Philippines community, I think we invite local users for their opinions on this. Pinging in: @ Sky Harbor:, @ Howard the Duck:, @ RioHondo:, @ Korean Rail Fan:, @ Koressha: @ Hiwilms:, @ Hariboneagle927:. TagaSanPedroAko ( talk) 06:46, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment We are aware of the dire lack unified of standards in Philippine transit, let alone railways. We must define our own; hence, 1) may I quote:
We use sentence case for the title — "station" in lowercase; [sic] ...disambiguate articles properly, "Santa Rosa station (PNR)".
— User:Hiwilms 06:29, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- If we can all agree that the sentence case should be in lowercase, and this is what we would refer to as grammatically correct, then might as well support the RM. 2) If this is widely used in other countries (as
Dicklyon said re: the
MOS:CAPS basic scheme and
WP:USSTATION and
WP:UKSTATION, then so be it; overseas Filipinos might benefit from this as well. 3) Our stations are not run by Japan; hence we can choose which MOS or rules to follow.
If all else fails, WP:IAF.4) Lastly, maybe it would be better to establish this and a few other standards as well in a WikiProject? {{u| Koressha}} { interact| ambags} 07:19, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Please do not move
5th Avenue station (PNR) →
5th Avenue Station or
Santa Rosa (PNR station) →
Santa Rosa Station. This would cause confusion with similarly named stations listed on disambiguation pages
5th Avenue station and
Santa Rosa station.
Certes (
talk) 11:26, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- I'll move them with the appropriate disamb.-- TagaSanPedroAko ( talk) 23:29, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment. No vote either way, but a cursory glance at Google News searches for Dela Rosa station shows the Title Case variant with more usages than the Sentence case variant, around 3:2. Not much, but since this is an RM, there should be convincing evidence that the new title, in this case, the Title Case variant satisfies WP:NC. I say it's debatable, at least when Dela Rosa station is concerned. I also used this random sampling for the Blumentritt LRT station (LOL currently located in a badly named title), and differences in usage aren't that far apart on that one either. Howard the Duck ( talk) 11:39, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment It could make sense to move pages in order to have Station included in their titles. But, given that we have an existing project-wide consensus that does not have an overriding local consensus yet (unless if we decide to make one eventually, which would be another long and convoluted process), the status quo may be left to stand for now. It's oddly interesting that the local consensus for the railways and stations in Japan are different from almost anywhere else, but that probably points to how the companies there run their railways so well. LSGH ( talk) ( contributions) 13:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- @
LSGH: Have read this
RM thread of a South Korea train station which included a station in Japan, as well as other RMs involving renaming of stations in Korea and elsewhere with titles in sentence case, I now agree that train station names, regardless of where country they are in or what the signs say, should be normally sentence case. Nevertheless, we're still seeing controversial moves, such as with
Seoul's central train station. --
TagaSanPedroAko (
talk) 02:26, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Agree that Japan is an odd outlier and ought to be fixed. Keep in mind too that there are exceptions, where Station is an inherent part of a name, like "Union Station" in various places. My look at sources suggests that
Seoul Station may be such an exception; not sure.
Dicklyon (
talk) 05:16, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- I saw the recent set of moves that involved stations in Korea. I was inclining to support the most recent move back to using uppercase for a handful of railway stations (while agreeing to using lowercase for most others), but only to note that these railway stations are often shared with subway stations, where the use of station is the norm. As for Japan, some others say that there were government-issued guidelines that became the basis for the long-standing MOS convention there.
LSGH (
talk) (
contributions) 15:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- @
Dicklyon: For Japanese train stations, agree with making them follow the project-wide guidelines, with possible exceptions at least for large central intermodal stations, especially those in the center of large cities (e.g. Tokyo and Shinjuku). For Seoul Station, same thing as above (can do the same as well for large central stations of other cities). Be bold and discuss that with the Japanese and Korean regional WikiProjects.
TagaSanPedroAko (
talk) 00:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not ready to take on Japan yet, as their local consensus will probably involve a fight to try to straighten out. Korea seems to be settled now, except for what the exceptions might be, and I'm open to hearing more about those. The US is nicely settled for station (without much help from me), but is a holdout for "Line" and sometimes other things (like subway, branch, tunnel) where caps are clearly not well supported by sources. For example , we have probably a few thousand articles with "New York City Subway" even though the MTA that runs that system mostly does not cap "subway" in that expression. But the subway fans didn't want to hear that; if it's capped on the map title, that's good enough for them. That's not a battle I can win, even with the backing of the handful of editors who regularly support going along with MOS guidance. Until there are more editors who care about the MOS, there will be some of these rogue styles. Dicklyon ( talk) 03:09, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- @
Dicklyon: For Japanese train stations, agree with making them follow the project-wide guidelines, with possible exceptions at least for large central intermodal stations, especially those in the center of large cities (e.g. Tokyo and Shinjuku). For Seoul Station, same thing as above (can do the same as well for large central stations of other cities). Be bold and discuss that with the Japanese and Korean regional WikiProjects.
TagaSanPedroAko (
talk) 00:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- I saw the recent set of moves that involved stations in Korea. I was inclining to support the most recent move back to using uppercase for a handful of railway stations (while agreeing to using lowercase for most others), but only to note that these railway stations are often shared with subway stations, where the use of station is the norm. As for Japan, some others say that there were government-issued guidelines that became the basis for the long-standing MOS convention there.
LSGH (
talk) (
contributions) 15:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Agree that Japan is an odd outlier and ought to be fixed. Keep in mind too that there are exceptions, where Station is an inherent part of a name, like "Union Station" in various places. My look at sources suggests that
Seoul Station may be such an exception; not sure.
Dicklyon (
talk) 05:16, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- @
LSGH: Have read this
RM thread of a South Korea train station which included a station in Japan, as well as other RMs involving renaming of stations in Korea and elsewhere with titles in sentence case, I now agree that train station names, regardless of where country they are in or what the signs say, should be normally sentence case. Nevertheless, we're still seeing controversial moves, such as with
Seoul's central train station. --
TagaSanPedroAko (
talk) 02:26, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment While we're on the issue of station consistency, I'd like uninvolved editors to look at and/or continue the stale discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Canadian stations)#GO station naming, and voice their opinions on naming formats for Toronto's commuter rail system. Cards 84664 00:57, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment What about the stations set to be renamed (e.g Pacita MG to Pacita, Governor Pascual to Malabon)? Also while were at it, we should make standards for naming the stations of rapid transit/metro and mainline rail (and maybe even the colors of the railway lines). ITSQUIETUPTOWN talk • contribs 09:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Itsquietuptown's statements are exactly my thoughts; owing to the lack of organized standards here in our local railways.
- Perhaps we have to 1) identify the proper naming convention (yet we are here in 'Station' vs 'station') that is and would be more correct to the Filipino's knowledge on grammar and usage. Then 2) for instances like "Pacita Main Gate", we can consider the colloquial usage (how do local commuters call it, is it "Pacita station" or "Pacita MG station"? 3) Disambs in parentheses are not a problem (as echoed above)
iff there is another station of the same name. 4) If an exception really has to be considered, then might as well respect that. Regardless, things are subject to change which is why we constantly edit over time. Pinging in other members who might chime in: @
Raku Hachijo and
BicolExpressHunter: and quick question, is "5th Avenue station (PNR)" a more common name than "C-3 station"? {{ping|
Koressha}} {
interact|
ambags} 10:23, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- @
Koressha: I'm from the far south of Manila, so I don't know which one between 5th Avenue and C-3 is preferred for that station's name. Now let's see if we can get one who's from the area to respond.
Raku Hachijo (
talk) 01:53, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah it's alright; the question is for anyone in this thread, though what you can say re: 'Station' or 'station' is why I tagged other editors like you. It surely will count. {{ping|
Koressha}} {
interact|
ambags} 02:09, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- 5th Avenue station is 5th Avenue. Station code is "5TH" as seen on a Rappler article on PNR's punctuality. Hiwilms Talk 06:39, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah it's alright; the question is for anyone in this thread, though what you can say re: 'Station' or 'station' is why I tagged other editors like you. It surely will count. {{ping|
Koressha}} {
interact|
ambags} 02:09, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- @
Koressha: I'm from the far south of Manila, so I don't know which one between 5th Avenue and C-3 is preferred for that station's name. Now let's see if we can get one who's from the area to respond.
Raku Hachijo (
talk) 01:53, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 03:56, 16 April 2021 (UTC)