This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance). An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Comics: Creators / United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Related work groups: /  This article is supported by Comics creators work group. This article is supported by United States comics work group. This article has been marked as requiring an image. Please add one in accordance with guidance.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Jurassic Park (film)#Distribution|Jurassic Park]] The anchor (#Distribution) has been deleted by other users before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

As we have an article for each of them do we need a third? ( Emperor ( talk) 23:15, 16 September 2008 (UTC)) reply

It's a good question. I agree that three entries is redundant, but I didn't really have a precedent — are there other husband-and-wife writing teams? Obviously, Tom and Mary have slightly different biographies, but otherwise their writing career is identical. If anything, I think it makes more sense to keep a single Tom & Mary entry than have separate ones for both of them. — Stoshmaster ( talk) 02:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Personally I like the "normalisation" and the reduction in replication but I have yet to see much precedence for it. I had a look at around and found Gilbert and Sullivan (which makes sense as the term itself is notable as is their collaboration) and I found another one where the individuals didn't have their own articles as well as collaborators whose names are commonly given together who don't have joint articles (like Dick Clement and Ian La Frenais. I have yet to find anything similar to this though. ( Emperor ( talk) 03:41, 18 September 2008 (UTC)) reply

I could see a joint article or two individual articles, but having all three seems redundant to me as well, especially since there's no notable divergence in their published work (unlike, say, the partners Rodgers & Hammerstein). For now, I think it would be simpler to have one joint article à la The Brothers Hildebrandt. As far as I know there is no Wikipedia guideline for this, and there probably doesn't need to be. -- GentlemanGhost ( talk) 19:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Okay, I combined the bios and other details from their individual entries into this one. Who wants to take control of deleting the individual entries and creating the proper redirects? Stoshmaster ( talk) 14:33, 26 September 2008 (UTC) reply