This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Oxford Guide to the Book of Common Prayer: A Worldwide Survey article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The Oxford Guide to the Book of Common Prayer: A Worldwide Survey has been listed as one of the
Philosophy and religion good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 1, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from The Oxford Guide to the Book of Common Prayer: A Worldwide Survey appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 19 December 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton
talk 19:29, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Created by Pbritti ( talk). Self-nominated at 19:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/The Oxford Guide to the Book of Common Prayer: A Worldwide Survey; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
There is a sentence "He also noted a typological error in Marion Hatchett's chapter..." [emphasis mine]. I suspect that it should be typographical rather than typological, but I can't be certain as I do not have access to the source. Can someone check this? -- Verbarson talk edits 14:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Pbritti ( talk · contribs)
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap ( talk · contribs) 21:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This is a coherent and properly-cited book article with few issues to note. Accordingly my comments are mainly small items or suggestions. There is no QPQ in GA reviewing but I'd be delighted if you would take the time to review one of my nominations.
Each of the seven parts of the book covers a different subject:- well, one would assume so really. Maybe reword.
underscore[d] 'Anglicans do their theology- we need to say "underscore[d that]" for this sentence to work.
pre-Reformation... back to Augustine of Canterbury.- it would be helpful here to give dates, or at least something that indicates coverage: how far back before the Reformation does the chapter go, so how many centuries are missing? You might say "it covers Bede but not Augustine", for instance, if that's what it does.
spanning the 16th to the 19th century similar to Eamon Duffy's- some punctuation seems to be missing here.
He also noted a typographical error in Marion Hatchett's chapter, where the placement of Prayer of Humble Access within the 1789 American prayer book is inaccurately described.- this is a lot of coverage of one typo. Weil actually found the book admirable and successful in meeting its goals, so I'd say the paragraph is unduly negative and does not reflect Weil's review accurately.
This is almost ready for GA status as soon as the comments above have been addressed. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 22:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Oxford Guide to the Book of Common Prayer: A Worldwide Survey article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The Oxford Guide to the Book of Common Prayer: A Worldwide Survey has been listed as one of the
Philosophy and religion good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 1, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from The Oxford Guide to the Book of Common Prayer: A Worldwide Survey appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 19 December 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton
talk 19:29, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Created by Pbritti ( talk). Self-nominated at 19:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/The Oxford Guide to the Book of Common Prayer: A Worldwide Survey; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
There is a sentence "He also noted a typological error in Marion Hatchett's chapter..." [emphasis mine]. I suspect that it should be typographical rather than typological, but I can't be certain as I do not have access to the source. Can someone check this? -- Verbarson talk edits 14:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Pbritti ( talk · contribs)
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap ( talk · contribs) 21:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This is a coherent and properly-cited book article with few issues to note. Accordingly my comments are mainly small items or suggestions. There is no QPQ in GA reviewing but I'd be delighted if you would take the time to review one of my nominations.
Each of the seven parts of the book covers a different subject:- well, one would assume so really. Maybe reword.
underscore[d] 'Anglicans do their theology- we need to say "underscore[d that]" for this sentence to work.
pre-Reformation... back to Augustine of Canterbury.- it would be helpful here to give dates, or at least something that indicates coverage: how far back before the Reformation does the chapter go, so how many centuries are missing? You might say "it covers Bede but not Augustine", for instance, if that's what it does.
spanning the 16th to the 19th century similar to Eamon Duffy's- some punctuation seems to be missing here.
He also noted a typographical error in Marion Hatchett's chapter, where the placement of Prayer of Humble Access within the 1789 American prayer book is inaccurately described.- this is a lot of coverage of one typo. Weil actually found the book admirable and successful in meeting its goals, so I'd say the paragraph is unduly negative and does not reflect Weil's review accurately.
This is almost ready for GA status as soon as the comments above have been addressed. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 22:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)