This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Stateside Puerto Ricans article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Someone really should look at the demographic section were they state what percentage of Hispanics Puerto Ricans are in Puerto Rican heavy states, because by the 2010 census data does percentages are way off. I changed them, but then someone reverted them back, so someone should check that out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FamAD123 ( talk • contribs) 01:43, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
This article should have a Spanish version, so Puerto Ricans that only speak Spanish can read it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.194.233.139 ( talk) 04:30, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
that details the number of puerto ricans in the country and the percentage change over the years, I need to know how to change it, the population increased 26.3% over the previous decade, not 35%. Could someone change that or tell me how to, because I'm not sure how to. FamAD123 ( talk) 05:38, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Why does this page seem so bias towards New York? Also why is this page, the only Hispanic page that acts like race doesnt exist?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spreadofknowledge ( talk • contribs) 22:25, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Puerto Ricans in the United States's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "pewhispanic.org":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:22, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Fixed. Section removed in both instances. Had already been checked and failed WP:VERIFY as WP:OR and WP:POV use of source which examines US census self-identification being presented as if it were DNA or other scientific research into ethnicity. User responsible for POV-push resumed activities on these articles tweaking existing references (such as citing a 2004 article analysing 2010 census statistics); using the same sources which failed verification and declaring them as being factual here, here and here.
the article should either be renamed pr should give more attention to Puerto Ricans who live on the island. Even a Puerto Rican who hasn't ever left San Juan is still a Puerto Rican in the United States. As it stands, the article seems to treat Puerto Ricans as non-americans. I say it's offensive and bullhonkey. -- 108.45.56.173 ( talk) 01:08, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Puerto Ricans in the United States's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Graces":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:42, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
In the section of New York City, one of the paragraphs starts:
In essence, the sentence is saying "The struggle remains fairly low." I'm not sure that is what was intended. I assume it's the availability of both that is low and the struggle is continuing.
Also, I am not sure what "the struggle for legal work." Is the issue a lack of work or a lack of legal jobs? What is meant by legal jobs?
Finally, in the section on Chicago there's this phrase:
What is a "turnt around gang"? Is this the name of the gang or a type of gang? If this is an actual phrase and not vandalism, there should be a link to the meaning of those words. Ileanadu ( talk) 22:21, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
The Spanish version of this article [ [1]] has the same problem:
"La lucha ... sigue ... baja"
I don't see anything about a gang. Ileanadu ( talk) 22:54, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
There has been spate of rollbacks by [[
User:RichardWeiss]] to the articles
Cuban Americans,
Dominican Americans,
Puerto Ricans in the United States,
Brazilian Americans,
Chilean Americans,
Colombian Americans,
Venezuelan Americans,
White Hispanic and Latino Americans,
Brown (racial classification),
Race and ethnicity in Colombia,
Discrimination based on skin color,
Coloniality of power,
Colonial mentality,
Racial hierarchy,
Racism in South America, and
Hispanic and Latino Americans.
These have been undone, since:
If you wish to engage in constructive behavior (e.g. questioning the validity of sources), a good place to start would be on the talk pages of the respective articles. Resorting to random drive-by reverts is generally considered unhelpful. Thanks.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.252.4.106 ( talk) 11:50, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. There is a consensus that is an acceptable target title, though the acceptance is not unanimous, which is not required for a consensus to emerge. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 00:41, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Puerto Ricans in the United States →
Stateside Puerto Ricans – I reverted an edit by
Llakew18. They recently moved page "Puerto Ricans in the United States" to "Stateside Puerto Ricans (Puerto Ricans in the United States)" with the reasoning Original title make Puerto Ricans look like foreign immigrants which they are not. They Stateside Puerto Ricans are ethnic Puerto Ricans living in the mainland and non-mainland states (e.g. Hawaii) of the U.S.
I agree, but think that such a bold move needs discussion.
epicgenius (
talk) 14:58, 8 August 2019 (UTC) --Relisting.
KSFT (
t|
c) 04:25, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
--User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 01:04, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Puerto Ricans do not lose their Puerto Rican citizenship when they move to a state in the U.S. -- The Eloquent Peasant ( talk) 17:21, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Stateside Puerto Ricans article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Someone really should look at the demographic section were they state what percentage of Hispanics Puerto Ricans are in Puerto Rican heavy states, because by the 2010 census data does percentages are way off. I changed them, but then someone reverted them back, so someone should check that out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FamAD123 ( talk • contribs) 01:43, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
This article should have a Spanish version, so Puerto Ricans that only speak Spanish can read it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.194.233.139 ( talk) 04:30, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
that details the number of puerto ricans in the country and the percentage change over the years, I need to know how to change it, the population increased 26.3% over the previous decade, not 35%. Could someone change that or tell me how to, because I'm not sure how to. FamAD123 ( talk) 05:38, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Why does this page seem so bias towards New York? Also why is this page, the only Hispanic page that acts like race doesnt exist?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spreadofknowledge ( talk • contribs) 22:25, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Puerto Ricans in the United States's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "pewhispanic.org":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:22, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Fixed. Section removed in both instances. Had already been checked and failed WP:VERIFY as WP:OR and WP:POV use of source which examines US census self-identification being presented as if it were DNA or other scientific research into ethnicity. User responsible for POV-push resumed activities on these articles tweaking existing references (such as citing a 2004 article analysing 2010 census statistics); using the same sources which failed verification and declaring them as being factual here, here and here.
the article should either be renamed pr should give more attention to Puerto Ricans who live on the island. Even a Puerto Rican who hasn't ever left San Juan is still a Puerto Rican in the United States. As it stands, the article seems to treat Puerto Ricans as non-americans. I say it's offensive and bullhonkey. -- 108.45.56.173 ( talk) 01:08, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Puerto Ricans in the United States's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Graces":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:42, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
In the section of New York City, one of the paragraphs starts:
In essence, the sentence is saying "The struggle remains fairly low." I'm not sure that is what was intended. I assume it's the availability of both that is low and the struggle is continuing.
Also, I am not sure what "the struggle for legal work." Is the issue a lack of work or a lack of legal jobs? What is meant by legal jobs?
Finally, in the section on Chicago there's this phrase:
What is a "turnt around gang"? Is this the name of the gang or a type of gang? If this is an actual phrase and not vandalism, there should be a link to the meaning of those words. Ileanadu ( talk) 22:21, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
The Spanish version of this article [ [1]] has the same problem:
"La lucha ... sigue ... baja"
I don't see anything about a gang. Ileanadu ( talk) 22:54, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
There has been spate of rollbacks by [[
User:RichardWeiss]] to the articles
Cuban Americans,
Dominican Americans,
Puerto Ricans in the United States,
Brazilian Americans,
Chilean Americans,
Colombian Americans,
Venezuelan Americans,
White Hispanic and Latino Americans,
Brown (racial classification),
Race and ethnicity in Colombia,
Discrimination based on skin color,
Coloniality of power,
Colonial mentality,
Racial hierarchy,
Racism in South America, and
Hispanic and Latino Americans.
These have been undone, since:
If you wish to engage in constructive behavior (e.g. questioning the validity of sources), a good place to start would be on the talk pages of the respective articles. Resorting to random drive-by reverts is generally considered unhelpful. Thanks.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.252.4.106 ( talk) 11:50, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. There is a consensus that is an acceptable target title, though the acceptance is not unanimous, which is not required for a consensus to emerge. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 00:41, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Puerto Ricans in the United States →
Stateside Puerto Ricans – I reverted an edit by
Llakew18. They recently moved page "Puerto Ricans in the United States" to "Stateside Puerto Ricans (Puerto Ricans in the United States)" with the reasoning Original title make Puerto Ricans look like foreign immigrants which they are not. They Stateside Puerto Ricans are ethnic Puerto Ricans living in the mainland and non-mainland states (e.g. Hawaii) of the U.S.
I agree, but think that such a bold move needs discussion.
epicgenius (
talk) 14:58, 8 August 2019 (UTC) --Relisting.
KSFT (
t|
c) 04:25, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
--User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 01:04, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Puerto Ricans do not lose their Puerto Rican citizenship when they move to a state in the U.S. -- The Eloquent Peasant ( talk) 17:21, 2 October 2019 (UTC)