From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It may be nice to add a section indicating more clearly the parallels between the Bronfman/Seagram and the Gursky/McTavish histories. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colin Rowat ( talkcontribs) 14:41, 11 July 2010 (UTC) reply

Criticism section

This section presents commentary on the book - but whose ? If quotes, they should be presented as such. If not - are they original research ? -- Beardo ( talk) 14:16, 3 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I deleted this section because I think that it is written inappropriately for wikipedia. It reads to me like some wiki user's commentary, because there are no citations and the passage has awkward syntax. A section on "criticism" should be professional criticism, someone should add the section again if it can be cited and hopefully written better as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Applespeachespumpkinpie ( talkcontribs) 07:51, 17 July 2012 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It may be nice to add a section indicating more clearly the parallels between the Bronfman/Seagram and the Gursky/McTavish histories. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colin Rowat ( talkcontribs) 14:41, 11 July 2010 (UTC) reply

Criticism section

This section presents commentary on the book - but whose ? If quotes, they should be presented as such. If not - are they original research ? -- Beardo ( talk) 14:16, 3 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I deleted this section because I think that it is written inappropriately for wikipedia. It reads to me like some wiki user's commentary, because there are no citations and the passage has awkward syntax. A section on "criticism" should be professional criticism, someone should add the section again if it can be cited and hopefully written better as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Applespeachespumpkinpie ( talkcontribs) 07:51, 17 July 2012 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook