This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (the controversy surrounding his hiring and subsequent firing, all highly publicized in the media in itself make him a notable person.) -- 38.70.6.6 ( talk) 20:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because the comedians hiring and subsequent firing from SNL will be worthy of a Wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.244.128.154 ( talk) 20:39, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
This seems to be part of what should be a bigger article regarding comedians negatively affected by political correctness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.184.55.7 ( talk) 00:36, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The popular Twitter account SNL In Review first noticed Gillis praising disgraced comedian [Louis CK] in an interview, alerting comedy journalist Seth Simons, who began digging deeper in Gillis' history. 38.104.236.130 ( talk) 16:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Because this seems to be a controversial addition with certain users (namely two or three unregistered users), can we clarify whether the following passage under
§ 2020–present: Career expansion is
WP:DUE? Christina Izzo of The A.V. Club compared his opening monologue to that of Jo Koy's hosting of the 81st Golden Globe Awards writing, "Remember Jo Koy's catastrophic opening monologue at the Golden Globes last month? Shane Gillis gave him some serious competition here."
I personally see no issue. 〜
Askarion
✉ 00:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
I went looking through the other articles for some alternatives to this quote to see if the users who take issue with Izzo's quote like either of these better. I think both pass WP:10YEARS better and are from stronger sources, but again, I'm not torn up about this issue one way or the other:
It’s hard to imagine that this muted monologue will impress his fans or enrage his detractors. Again: weak tea." Zach Vasquez, The Guardian
[V]iewers got an OK episode that, more than anything, might leave them wondering why a middling talent like Gillis got tapped to host the show in the first place." Eric Deggans, NPR
There aren't a ton of great alternatives, but those are two possibilities. 〜 Askarion ✉ 01:17, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
In discussions related to living people, a lack of consensus often results in the removal of the contentious matter, regardless of whether the proposal was to add, modify, or remove it.") while and if further discussions are had, though it seems to me like everyone who cares has said their piece. 〜 Askarion ✉ 13:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
There appears to be a negative bias against Gillis when referring to his SNL monologue. in the interest of fairness either both sides of the argument should be present or have a completely neutral opinion. 92.40.193.173 ( talk) 23:19, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (the controversy surrounding his hiring and subsequent firing, all highly publicized in the media in itself make him a notable person.) -- 38.70.6.6 ( talk) 20:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because the comedians hiring and subsequent firing from SNL will be worthy of a Wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.244.128.154 ( talk) 20:39, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
This seems to be part of what should be a bigger article regarding comedians negatively affected by political correctness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.184.55.7 ( talk) 00:36, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The popular Twitter account SNL In Review first noticed Gillis praising disgraced comedian [Louis CK] in an interview, alerting comedy journalist Seth Simons, who began digging deeper in Gillis' history. 38.104.236.130 ( talk) 16:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Because this seems to be a controversial addition with certain users (namely two or three unregistered users), can we clarify whether the following passage under
§ 2020–present: Career expansion is
WP:DUE? Christina Izzo of The A.V. Club compared his opening monologue to that of Jo Koy's hosting of the 81st Golden Globe Awards writing, "Remember Jo Koy's catastrophic opening monologue at the Golden Globes last month? Shane Gillis gave him some serious competition here."
I personally see no issue. 〜
Askarion
✉ 00:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
I went looking through the other articles for some alternatives to this quote to see if the users who take issue with Izzo's quote like either of these better. I think both pass WP:10YEARS better and are from stronger sources, but again, I'm not torn up about this issue one way or the other:
It’s hard to imagine that this muted monologue will impress his fans or enrage his detractors. Again: weak tea." Zach Vasquez, The Guardian
[V]iewers got an OK episode that, more than anything, might leave them wondering why a middling talent like Gillis got tapped to host the show in the first place." Eric Deggans, NPR
There aren't a ton of great alternatives, but those are two possibilities. 〜 Askarion ✉ 01:17, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
In discussions related to living people, a lack of consensus often results in the removal of the contentious matter, regardless of whether the proposal was to add, modify, or remove it.") while and if further discussions are had, though it seems to me like everyone who cares has said their piece. 〜 Askarion ✉ 13:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
There appears to be a negative bias against Gillis when referring to his SNL monologue. in the interest of fairness either both sides of the argument should be present or have a completely neutral opinion. 92.40.193.173 ( talk) 23:19, 4 March 2024 (UTC)