This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
This disambiguation page is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to
Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at
WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
On 20 June 2022, it was proposed that this article be
moved to
Seadragon. The result of
the discussion was no consensus.
Requested move 20 June 2022
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This is a contested technical request (
permalink). — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (
投稿) 19:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Schierbecker Why is an admin needed for this and not just a pagemover? Am I missing something? -
Kj cheetham (
talk) 10:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Indeed, an admin is not needed because the page is not move-protected.
GeoffreyT2000 (
talk) 13:40, 18 June 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Schierbecker, can you explain further why DABNAME would favor this form over the other? I don’t oppose, I just don’t fully understand. The last bullet of DABNAME at least favors the form most frequently used in its pages. I think I counted 5 single-word entries and 8 two-word entries (though a lot of those aren’t directly linked entries). As I said, not contesting, just seeking clarification. -
2pou (
talk) 15:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)reply
I'm also not objecting, but with no response and an element of doubt I suspect a full RM might be the best option. -
Kj cheetham (
talk) 17:36, 20 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
This disambiguation page is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to
Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at
WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
On 20 June 2022, it was proposed that this article be
moved to
Seadragon. The result of
the discussion was no consensus.
Requested move 20 June 2022
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This is a contested technical request (
permalink). — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (
投稿) 19:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Schierbecker Why is an admin needed for this and not just a pagemover? Am I missing something? -
Kj cheetham (
talk) 10:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Indeed, an admin is not needed because the page is not move-protected.
GeoffreyT2000 (
talk) 13:40, 18 June 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Schierbecker, can you explain further why DABNAME would favor this form over the other? I don’t oppose, I just don’t fully understand. The last bullet of DABNAME at least favors the form most frequently used in its pages. I think I counted 5 single-word entries and 8 two-word entries (though a lot of those aren’t directly linked entries). As I said, not contesting, just seeking clarification. -
2pou (
talk) 15:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)reply
I'm also not objecting, but with no response and an element of doubt I suspect a full RM might be the best option. -
Kj cheetham (
talk) 17:36, 20 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.